HervalFreire
- Karma
- 150
- Created
- March 12, 2023 (3y ago)
- Submissions
- 0
https://linktr.ee/herval
Contact info:
Address: 6363 Christie Ave, APT 2302, Emeryville, CA 94608
Phone: (917) 704-0699
email: hervalfreire@gmail.com
Media relations: Michelle Veronese
(https://www.linkedin.com/in/michelleveronese)
[flagged]
>The podcast is missing this healthy type of acceptance and appreciation of truth. The podcast is grounded in science and only speculates about the consequences via the data and the studies it cites. The people who were…
>That makes the border very important. Even if drawing the line in the right spot is impossible, it's imperative that we recognize when it has gone from one side to the other, No it's not. Because such a line may not…
>It may not be exactly clear where a temperature becomes 'hot', but the sun is still not a great place to host your wedding. But right now we are currently at the border. LLMs are nearing the line of demarcation. So…
Not if you use modern python. And by modern python I mean typed python. Heavily typed.
In my opinion it's not pretty ok. It's actually superior to many other languages. I think for web stuff though the borrowing and move semantics is a bit of an overkill. Usually you don't need to thread or handle state…
> Emergent properties of systems aren't less real just because they exist in a different regime than the underlying mechanics of the system. I'm not claiming emergent properties aren't real. I am claiming the nature of…
It's not about the fuzzy border. It doesn't matter if the border is fuzzy or not. The point is the border doesn't exist in the first place. You created the border with the vocabulary. The concept itself is not intrinsic…
That's an inaccurate test. You can't know if the answer was real or stochastic parroting. Any attempt at consciousness requires us to define the word. And the word itself may not even represent anything real. We have a…
>You can't just handwave away complexity. It's entirely possible for the US to have too little regulation in some fields and too much regulation in other fields. I didn't handwave anything. My answer is sufficiently…
That future is already here. All WebApps abstract state to some external program. Bare in mind this is only for web dev. Many other things outside of web dev cannot abstract state so easily. For example: The person who…
Would it be different if I told you that what I wrote here is based on and confirmed by science? When subject to the rigor of statistical confirmation then what I said is no longer a "perspective". It is a fundamental…
>but my point is that none of it is indicative that someone having generally a positive view of the world necessarily implies that they would have less grasp on reality. From the podcast: Joanna: The people who were the…
https://radiolab.org/episodes/91618-lying-to-ourselves What I'm saying is not something I made up. It's actual science. Listen to the podcast if you have the time. It's derived from actual multitudes of scientific…
>I can’t find any exact phrase matches online, and the writing style and overall glib superficiality reminds me of ChatGPT output. I got it from my notes for an unrelated project. You can't find it because I wrote the…
>It's rather disingenuous to say "there are always exceptions". Then what do you want me to say? It's the truth. There are always exceptions. Always. You want me to say you're right when you're actually wrong? > but…
Who knows? You could be right and I could be the one that is totally blind. I propose an experiment to find out just which one of us is actually more delusional. To start off, how would you rate yourself in terms of…
There was a science experiment where they took pessimists and optimists and had them rate themselves from one to ten in terms of looks. Then they had another external group of people rate them based off of the same 1 to…
They have some good stuff. Spider Man: No way home. Mandalorian is pretty good, Star wars: Andor was the best Star Wars I've seen in a while. I guess a lot of people missed out on Andor given that almost everything Star…
Error: formula above should be a recurrence relation: P_n(correct) = (1 - Epsilon_n)*P_(n-1)(correct) Where P_0 = (1 - Epsilon_0)
>> LLMs have no knowledge of the underlying reality > They have no common sense & they can't plan their answer If his arguments are entirely based on this, then it's not fully correct: - GPT style language models try to…
That probability formula is too general. It can practically model everything. Yan is just hiding behind epsilon. It's like assigning a probability to the origin of the universe. You can just make shit up with a…
Not everything will be replaced, but you can extrapolate that much of what we do will be replaced. The thing that is harder to replace is the versatility of the human form. Manual labor can't fully be replaced because…
The asterisks thing is another issue. LLMs don't need to do this to replace directors. >Yes, this is what I mean by the limited capacity of a simple textual description. It's a fundamental limitation - natural language…
Train the AI exclusively on well lauded texts. Then you can get a generative AI that moves people. The problem with "reverse engineering people" is that you don't need to, the things they like in any era follows…