I do like my humour dry.
Sometimes people have to do what they believe is right.
That's true and if it works for you that's great. Getting preachy about it isn't going to win you friends or change anyone's mind.
To answer my own question, it's in ES6: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9813277
This is cool. It also raises the possibility of adding tail call optimisation to JavaScript interpreters. Anyone know if that would be feasible?
I think competition has been good for all smartphone consumers so keep up the good work Samsung! (speaking as an iPhone user)
"it could be argued to be less efficient for certain types of data" This is true of all lossless compression.
I do like my humour dry.
Sometimes people have to do what they believe is right.
That's true and if it works for you that's great. Getting preachy about it isn't going to win you friends or change anyone's mind.
To answer my own question, it's in ES6: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9813277
This is cool. It also raises the possibility of adding tail call optimisation to JavaScript interpreters. Anyone know if that would be feasible?
I think competition has been good for all smartphone consumers so keep up the good work Samsung! (speaking as an iPhone user)
"it could be argued to be less efficient for certain types of data" This is true of all lossless compression.