HlessClaudesman
No user record in our sample, but HlessClaudesman has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but HlessClaudesman has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
I would distill all the cars.
Translation: Alibaba will continue distillation attacks using accounts that aren't directly attributable to it's own corporate infrastructure.
I also have a 500gb Mac. Recently I cleaned up HDD using Daisy Disk whilst asking Claude "do I need this?" questions. Runs much better now.
People finding a way to tolerate what was previously considered intolerable is pretty much the story of civilization.
it.rubsthelotiononit.self
You would think, but My 2019 MacBook can barely run an older xcode that doesn't emulate newer phones / tablets. Some of these responses to my above post are a bit haughty. I'm just reporting from the trenches that the…
As an app developer, having to eat an ever increasing Mac hardware cost upfront may push people like me to just focus on Android.
I don't think there is much overlap between people capable of building cutting edge LLM's and the people who want to build a cutting edge LLM for the government.
Who will make them the next set of weights? If a government can just seize the product of someone else's labour, either they will end up as slave owners or without willing workers.
Even if AI is the next combustion engine, would you bet the farm on a C tier buggy whip manufacturer like Oracle being the next Ford or General Motors?
Why ask for an account / sign up at all?
John Jumper Jumps to Anthropic, was right there.
Google's AI is hamstrung by a culture of safetyisim, by that I mean going beyond what we can all recognise as safe limits to protect the user from imaginary ephemeral things like cultural harms. So maximal safety at all…
I'm sure every business can pull out an area and say: this is profitable. It's a classic hide the losses a shell game. So many shills on HN today, feels sponsored.
They cannot grow indefinitely when they make a loss on every user. More growth = bigger losses. Current investors should be left holding this shit bag, better them than retirement funds.
These numbers show that OpenAI is boned. They have no path to profitability and if they raise prices or cut services they will strangle their golden goose. They could have existed indefinitely as a service layer that…
Challenge accepted: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DC1GotK2F/
The commenter above seems to be describing late stage capitalism, where businesses exist mainly to milk investors, as told by bad boy tech executive Dick Jones in the 1980's action movie RoboCop.
“I had a guaranteed military sale with ED 209, renovation program, spare parts for twenty-five years… Who cares if it worked or not?!?”
This news matters because investors should prefer safer investments than: well at least it's not a "doomsday scenario" grade.
Indeed. Is America really very far from the Soviet planned economy where the Dear Leader would manage what crops got planted, and who would starve?
If American services can be yeeted on a whim, American services can no longer be relied upon. The Fable debacle seems destined to be the canonical reason why the EU built their own software / AI ecosystem.
I was about 8 or 9 on my first reading, those chapters are just slow and don't advance the plot, probably would have bounced me out of the book. As an adult I found the author's horny depiction of Goldberry kind of off…
You are right to push back. I read it later.
My uncle who lent young me his copy of LOTR advised me to skip the Tom Bombadil chapters entirely, it was good advice.