ISSOtm
No user record in our sample, but ISSOtm has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but ISSOtm has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
Is it really that low an impact? A lot of the work performed in CI is duplicated (`apt update && apt install texlive-full` f.ex.), and thus there'd be a benefit to running it less often. Consider also…
I personally expected the AI stuff to be a fad that would go away quickly, and thus didn't get out the second they did that (for the same reason that distro-hopping is unhealthy). It's more a symptom of the frog…
Not F-Droid, but I have seen projects adding Codeberg support because it's starting to reach the threshold effect.
The point still stands for private repos, and also not making the job easy for them.
I also like it, particularly for its outstanding CI, but I don't like the patch/email-centric approach. (Gave it a try, didn't have a good time.)
Note that private repos are supported on Codeberg. (I would link to one of mine, but you'd just see a 404 :P)
SourceHut has Mercurial hosting: https://hg.sr.ht
Actually, that's only for the Woodpecker instance. Forgejo Actions can be used without asking for permission, and three tiers of (Linux-only, adm64-only) free runners are provided.