mainstream vs. special interest is probably better, I.e. content that appeals to lots of people but has low value to the average person vs. content that only appeals to a few people, but has a higher value to the people…
> the point is to have a guaranteed revenue stream so you can, frankly, make unpopular content That is one point, and that is currently being done. If the BBC were only to make unpopular content, it would be unpopular,…
Disclaimer: I am employed by the BBC, but not in PR, hence the throwaway > The whole point of the TV tax is that the BBC can take on projects that are > "worthy" but not commercially viable. Why does it have big-name…
mainstream vs. special interest is probably better, I.e. content that appeals to lots of people but has low value to the average person vs. content that only appeals to a few people, but has a higher value to the people…
> the point is to have a guaranteed revenue stream so you can, frankly, make unpopular content That is one point, and that is currently being done. If the BBC were only to make unpopular content, it would be unpopular,…
Disclaimer: I am employed by the BBC, but not in PR, hence the throwaway > The whole point of the TV tax is that the BBC can take on projects that are > "worthy" but not commercially viable. Why does it have big-name…