> I'm afraid you're stuck with our judgment about what's substantive, if you want to keep commenting here. For this and various other reasons, I honestly don't. I'm done.
It's not a tangent. The headline is potentially misleading and appears to be about a flamebait topic. Pay attention. Read. Comprehend.
I almost didn't even click. My gut reaction to the headline was "what train wreck did the Dilbert author create this time and do I feel like seeing the carnage?" Eventually I decided I did and was pleasantly surprised.
I thought the article did a fairly good job pointing out: - The only applications anyone is implementing on progcoins are exchanges and/or gambling. So far, dApps are a circular argument. - Smart contracts aren't so…
The guy just needed an outlet to talk about his piles. Hemorrhoids can be an embarrassing topic, so he wore a mask.
Nature's beautiful garbage disposal. Botulism. Anthrax. Vultures don't care.
You just don't understand the Metav3rse.
It's sort of weird to have watched the target demographic switch from college kids to everyone's older aunts and uncles. We went from "you should know better than to post that picture" to "you should know better than to…
Because we can only wager hazy guesses as to what it means to experience. If a line is to be drawn, than it must be drawn in seemingly inconsistent and arbitrary ways. There is a mimosa in a garden near me that will…
Obviously the correct answer is to call them by their preferred plural noun.
Eric Weinstein says some crazy stuff, but I remember hearing him once say that the best debate strategy for Republicans would be to mention the "noo-kyoo-lar" family, and let them correct you to "nuclear". Then you win…
Maybe. I'm not sure how you'd measure the benefit otherwise though. If you're going to compare apples to oranges (or deer road collisions to wolf predation of livestock), dollars is one of the ways you can.
> a wolf wrote it Don't be silly. That's clearly my grandmother.
Get rich quick by writing get-rich-quick books
> without most of the tulip mania
> Distributed computing ... when there's a code complexity resource you need to optimize for That's not fun. That's work. From TFA: > Remember: The DAO — first of its kind, from which all present DAOs take their name —…
> You don't need an integration at all: you just call the other company smart contract to see if the user has a specific type of equipment defined by an NFT. Uh, yeah... that's integration!
There's too much confusion of Utility with utility here.
> We can glue it back and use other mechanisms but it won't be exactly the same It will be harder to snap next time since wood glue bonds are usually stronger than the wood itself.
It's not a hotline for free therapy, and they only have the script/training for one circumstance. You don't blame your hammer if it doesn't saw very well.
In other words, he won so hard on proving the existence of bad taste that he's not allowed to play anymore. This is a "pit boss asking you to leave the table for winning too much" moment.
That first sentence is unnecessary and stinks of mod-bait.
I'm picturing Steve Jobs on stage to make an industry-shaking announcement... in a turtleneck tucked into his mom jeans, and glaring white sneakers.
> rich tech folks writing about areas way outside of their expertise Even if you were right, the majority of canonical art history comes down to how rich people are spending their money.
> My theory is that people don’t believe good taste exists because most people have bad taste This breaks down pretty quickly outside of fine art criticism. If I put 20 people in a room and only one of them has dressed…
> I'm afraid you're stuck with our judgment about what's substantive, if you want to keep commenting here. For this and various other reasons, I honestly don't. I'm done.
It's not a tangent. The headline is potentially misleading and appears to be about a flamebait topic. Pay attention. Read. Comprehend.
I almost didn't even click. My gut reaction to the headline was "what train wreck did the Dilbert author create this time and do I feel like seeing the carnage?" Eventually I decided I did and was pleasantly surprised.
I thought the article did a fairly good job pointing out: - The only applications anyone is implementing on progcoins are exchanges and/or gambling. So far, dApps are a circular argument. - Smart contracts aren't so…
The guy just needed an outlet to talk about his piles. Hemorrhoids can be an embarrassing topic, so he wore a mask.
Nature's beautiful garbage disposal. Botulism. Anthrax. Vultures don't care.
You just don't understand the Metav3rse.
It's sort of weird to have watched the target demographic switch from college kids to everyone's older aunts and uncles. We went from "you should know better than to post that picture" to "you should know better than to…
Because we can only wager hazy guesses as to what it means to experience. If a line is to be drawn, than it must be drawn in seemingly inconsistent and arbitrary ways. There is a mimosa in a garden near me that will…
Obviously the correct answer is to call them by their preferred plural noun.
Eric Weinstein says some crazy stuff, but I remember hearing him once say that the best debate strategy for Republicans would be to mention the "noo-kyoo-lar" family, and let them correct you to "nuclear". Then you win…
Maybe. I'm not sure how you'd measure the benefit otherwise though. If you're going to compare apples to oranges (or deer road collisions to wolf predation of livestock), dollars is one of the ways you can.
> a wolf wrote it Don't be silly. That's clearly my grandmother.
Get rich quick by writing get-rich-quick books
> without most of the tulip mania
> Distributed computing ... when there's a code complexity resource you need to optimize for That's not fun. That's work. From TFA: > Remember: The DAO — first of its kind, from which all present DAOs take their name —…
> You don't need an integration at all: you just call the other company smart contract to see if the user has a specific type of equipment defined by an NFT. Uh, yeah... that's integration!
There's too much confusion of Utility with utility here.
> We can glue it back and use other mechanisms but it won't be exactly the same It will be harder to snap next time since wood glue bonds are usually stronger than the wood itself.
It's not a hotline for free therapy, and they only have the script/training for one circumstance. You don't blame your hammer if it doesn't saw very well.
In other words, he won so hard on proving the existence of bad taste that he's not allowed to play anymore. This is a "pit boss asking you to leave the table for winning too much" moment.
That first sentence is unnecessary and stinks of mod-bait.
I'm picturing Steve Jobs on stage to make an industry-shaking announcement... in a turtleneck tucked into his mom jeans, and glaring white sneakers.
> rich tech folks writing about areas way outside of their expertise Even if you were right, the majority of canonical art history comes down to how rich people are spending their money.
> My theory is that people don’t believe good taste exists because most people have bad taste This breaks down pretty quickly outside of fine art criticism. If I put 20 people in a room and only one of them has dressed…