The way it's slightly off-center is unpleasant
What were the reasons to assume it would be true? I mean if you assume that NP < EXPTIME (which seems very likely) then you end up with algorithms that run in exponential time, but can't simulate turing machines with…
There's a chain of classes P, NP(aka Sigma_1), Sigma_2, .., Sigma_n, ... PSPACE, EXPTIME. What we know for sure is that P < EXPTIME, others are unknown (well, maybe this paper adds something to this, time will tell).…
Not if they start making killbots.
It's natively Q4.
They're picking among most likely tokens, which are ones with least entropy and so least information per token.
> But if the user thinks it looks fine, then won't most players think the same? I have a suspicion that when you're looking at (and generating, because you then look at the results) AI generated images and text more you…
I think I've seen studies that they still aren't. ICE are really (thermally) inefficient.
I wonder how robust these linters are. E.g. In C you might find some library function that allocates and abuse it to get dynamic memory.
If you want a function to compute BB(n) for any supplied n, then it isn't computable. But a specific number e.g. 123, BB(123) is just a number and for every integer i there is function const_i that computes i. You just…
At the place where it splits in two it also goes shifts forwards a bit
Well, it's computable as in there is a function that computes BB(n) for a specific n, but you'll never know which function it is.
At first people played Starcraft for the campaign, internet access in late 90s wasn't common enough for a game to thrive on mostly online multiplayer. And it was popular back then. And playing on LAN was more of "20…
A lot of people who could get out of Russia after the war started, did get out.
And somehow all the people I've met mentioning figures from papers (be it 1g, 1.4g or whatever) always seem to skip the "lean" part of "lean body mass" part, which is again a decent difference.
Extrapolating the rate, there won't be any left by the end of next quarter. I jest, but reading these is arduous and finding holes in them is going to take time for anyone daring to.
Isn't this controversial, to say the least?
The use of supposed little ways multiple people pushed the envelope in their sessions with no attribution whatsoever.
Not depth itself, but how using star you can get (ab)* in a much smaller expression than when you want to express it by forbidden patterns for star-free form. And if you nest it a few times r_to get to up to D depth[0]…
Yeah, but regular languages can handle parenthesised expressions up to some const parens-depth, which will be most of the code. And while it might be possible (not quite sure tbh) to express this in star-free manner,…
Funnily enough in computer science-land the often used model for transformsers corresponds to (heavily compressed) star-free languages, languages without counters, that specifically can't count things, like opening…
Generally doing something intentionally or unintentionally might have different penalties.
Imagine that somebody sold you text that they mislead you to think is not generated by AI and then trying to convince court that they didn't mislead you intentionally. If they've removed the watermark it stops this kind…
It's from algae, which are not plants.
You need to be aware of all ways outside people can rack up your bill. If you've got experience it's okay, but getting hit with a huge bill because you left an S3 bucket out in the open is something that has happened…
The way it's slightly off-center is unpleasant
What were the reasons to assume it would be true? I mean if you assume that NP < EXPTIME (which seems very likely) then you end up with algorithms that run in exponential time, but can't simulate turing machines with…
There's a chain of classes P, NP(aka Sigma_1), Sigma_2, .., Sigma_n, ... PSPACE, EXPTIME. What we know for sure is that P < EXPTIME, others are unknown (well, maybe this paper adds something to this, time will tell).…
Not if they start making killbots.
It's natively Q4.
They're picking among most likely tokens, which are ones with least entropy and so least information per token.
> But if the user thinks it looks fine, then won't most players think the same? I have a suspicion that when you're looking at (and generating, because you then look at the results) AI generated images and text more you…
I think I've seen studies that they still aren't. ICE are really (thermally) inefficient.
I wonder how robust these linters are. E.g. In C you might find some library function that allocates and abuse it to get dynamic memory.
If you want a function to compute BB(n) for any supplied n, then it isn't computable. But a specific number e.g. 123, BB(123) is just a number and for every integer i there is function const_i that computes i. You just…
At the place where it splits in two it also goes shifts forwards a bit
Well, it's computable as in there is a function that computes BB(n) for a specific n, but you'll never know which function it is.
At first people played Starcraft for the campaign, internet access in late 90s wasn't common enough for a game to thrive on mostly online multiplayer. And it was popular back then. And playing on LAN was more of "20…
A lot of people who could get out of Russia after the war started, did get out.
And somehow all the people I've met mentioning figures from papers (be it 1g, 1.4g or whatever) always seem to skip the "lean" part of "lean body mass" part, which is again a decent difference.
Extrapolating the rate, there won't be any left by the end of next quarter. I jest, but reading these is arduous and finding holes in them is going to take time for anyone daring to.
Isn't this controversial, to say the least?
The use of supposed little ways multiple people pushed the envelope in their sessions with no attribution whatsoever.
Not depth itself, but how using star you can get (ab)* in a much smaller expression than when you want to express it by forbidden patterns for star-free form. And if you nest it a few times r_to get to up to D depth[0]…
Yeah, but regular languages can handle parenthesised expressions up to some const parens-depth, which will be most of the code. And while it might be possible (not quite sure tbh) to express this in star-free manner,…
Funnily enough in computer science-land the often used model for transformsers corresponds to (heavily compressed) star-free languages, languages without counters, that specifically can't count things, like opening…
Generally doing something intentionally or unintentionally might have different penalties.
Imagine that somebody sold you text that they mislead you to think is not generated by AI and then trying to convince court that they didn't mislead you intentionally. If they've removed the watermark it stops this kind…
It's from algae, which are not plants.
You need to be aware of all ways outside people can rack up your bill. If you've got experience it's okay, but getting hit with a huge bill because you left an S3 bucket out in the open is something that has happened…