Surety is not a trusted central authority. There is no mathematically feasible way to backdate a document and weave it into the chain. The only way to circumvent the system would be to generate the same submitted hash…
"Hash and Sign" timestamping is flawed in that it relies on the trust of a central authority. An insider with access to the private key could easily backdate a timestamp and sign any document/timestamp combination.…
I believe the company is only active in that it still operates its service for existing customers. The website is very old, but you're right, it's admittedly ironic that a computer security company has an HTTP website.
Hi, ex-CEO of Surety here. The article is not very technical so I can see where you might assume this is not a true blockchain. However, the hash value published in the Times was, in fact, dependent upon every single…
Surety is not a trusted central authority. There is no mathematically feasible way to backdate a document and weave it into the chain. The only way to circumvent the system would be to generate the same submitted hash…
"Hash and Sign" timestamping is flawed in that it relies on the trust of a central authority. An insider with access to the private key could easily backdate a timestamp and sign any document/timestamp combination.…
I believe the company is only active in that it still operates its service for existing customers. The website is very old, but you're right, it's admittedly ironic that a computer security company has an HTTP website.
Hi, ex-CEO of Surety here. The article is not very technical so I can see where you might assume this is not a true blockchain. However, the hash value published in the Times was, in fact, dependent upon every single…