Is this not the same thing?
No, it sounds like mythos is just doing parallel trajectories. that's pretty distinct!
> Isolated the relevant code I mean isn't that most of it? If you put a snippet of code in front of me and said "there's probably a vulnerability here" I could probably spend a few hours (a much lower METR time!) and…
nit: it's a zettaflops, not a zettaflop
century energy ransomware no?
Well yeah social trust is worse in autocracies, you'd imagine that corruption would be lower on the list of problems you perceive having when 1) you don't have a good press to report on them 2) you can be sent to jail…
Because noncitizens can be motivated or not and / or resign and, frankly, there isn't that deep of a well of top tier AI talent. The threat of mass resignations led to OAI re-hiring sam altman, after all. Also why would…
Then you would get zero H1B and, frankly, green card signatures. There is real risk and real dependents at stake, I understand people who can't in good conscience put that at risk.
tbh mostly dismissive of Scott Alexander for fun, couldn't quite help myself
Data centers in space make sense because its nigh impossible to build things terrestrially. NIMBYism is so out of control the largest solar array in the US in the middle of the mojave got cancelled because it would…
iirc you can't do this for extensions which being a huge amount of compiler constraint resolution time
As your app scales, you're going to want to break out different parts into their own packages in order to keep compile times in check, so you're gonna be forced to go through SPM unless you use tuist or bazel.
You can't really easily use explicit types in much of idiomatic SwiftUI. The expression that the compiler is trying to solve is really complicated, I agree, but the solution to that is either changing how SwiftUI is…
Adding on, its also a bit much to say that Swift has a good level of sugar and reference an enum of all things. Swift's union type story is so poor that, instead of properly modeling state, people to this day still use…
You can develop Swift without it. I assume you mean SwiftUI / apple's sdk, which is what most people assume (a note, I'd say, to advocates of Swift who wish not to address SwiftUI: it's the biggest target, and its poor…
Broadly agree but, as is most things, the devil is in the details! - Xcode. A really rough ide that has a hard time at scale, choking on package refreshes, many targets, and more. It has a special entitlement so you…
Because white supremacists are, from some abstract level, undesirable? And some have white supremacist tendencies, so there has to be some way of, at the very least, ignoring them and ensuring that its possible to…
> The former is abusing the latter as a pretext for a (social) lynch mob. what would your alternative be?
I agree that you should evaluate languages in their domains. At the end of the day, Swift is mainly used for systems and iOS apps. In this, it is inadequate, as you can tell by, again, most apps not using the type…
I mean there should be _some_ sugar in a language like swift, no? It has sugar in many parts of the language, being able to define a simple type union should not require custom declaration of every forwarding accessor,…
Modern swift makes this technically possible but so cluttered that it's effectively impossible, especially compared with typescript. Swift distinguishes between inclusive and exclusive / exhaustive unions with enum vs…
iirc most of the energy comes from memory IO not arithmetic, so it's still not great. A better direction, though.
> Whereas these days any Democrat supporting any Republican action is likely to get primaried at the next election, and vice versa. Biden passed the bipartisan infrastructure act as well as USICA subsidies. The first…
> But DOGE likely achieved hundreds of billions a year in savings. USAID alone had a $50 billion budget that was mostly eliminated, though a few billion just moved over to State. A lot to unpack here ---- If you're an…
Saying "red tribe" is a pretty dead giveaway of, say, a certain way of thinking. George Soros or Bill Gates will never be able to buy their own department for reasons that the people with the tribalist lens can't seem…
Is this not the same thing?
No, it sounds like mythos is just doing parallel trajectories. that's pretty distinct!
> Isolated the relevant code I mean isn't that most of it? If you put a snippet of code in front of me and said "there's probably a vulnerability here" I could probably spend a few hours (a much lower METR time!) and…
nit: it's a zettaflops, not a zettaflop
century energy ransomware no?
Well yeah social trust is worse in autocracies, you'd imagine that corruption would be lower on the list of problems you perceive having when 1) you don't have a good press to report on them 2) you can be sent to jail…
Because noncitizens can be motivated or not and / or resign and, frankly, there isn't that deep of a well of top tier AI talent. The threat of mass resignations led to OAI re-hiring sam altman, after all. Also why would…
Then you would get zero H1B and, frankly, green card signatures. There is real risk and real dependents at stake, I understand people who can't in good conscience put that at risk.
tbh mostly dismissive of Scott Alexander for fun, couldn't quite help myself
Data centers in space make sense because its nigh impossible to build things terrestrially. NIMBYism is so out of control the largest solar array in the US in the middle of the mojave got cancelled because it would…
iirc you can't do this for extensions which being a huge amount of compiler constraint resolution time
As your app scales, you're going to want to break out different parts into their own packages in order to keep compile times in check, so you're gonna be forced to go through SPM unless you use tuist or bazel.
You can't really easily use explicit types in much of idiomatic SwiftUI. The expression that the compiler is trying to solve is really complicated, I agree, but the solution to that is either changing how SwiftUI is…
Adding on, its also a bit much to say that Swift has a good level of sugar and reference an enum of all things. Swift's union type story is so poor that, instead of properly modeling state, people to this day still use…
You can develop Swift without it. I assume you mean SwiftUI / apple's sdk, which is what most people assume (a note, I'd say, to advocates of Swift who wish not to address SwiftUI: it's the biggest target, and its poor…
Broadly agree but, as is most things, the devil is in the details! - Xcode. A really rough ide that has a hard time at scale, choking on package refreshes, many targets, and more. It has a special entitlement so you…
Because white supremacists are, from some abstract level, undesirable? And some have white supremacist tendencies, so there has to be some way of, at the very least, ignoring them and ensuring that its possible to…
> The former is abusing the latter as a pretext for a (social) lynch mob. what would your alternative be?
I agree that you should evaluate languages in their domains. At the end of the day, Swift is mainly used for systems and iOS apps. In this, it is inadequate, as you can tell by, again, most apps not using the type…
I mean there should be _some_ sugar in a language like swift, no? It has sugar in many parts of the language, being able to define a simple type union should not require custom declaration of every forwarding accessor,…
Modern swift makes this technically possible but so cluttered that it's effectively impossible, especially compared with typescript. Swift distinguishes between inclusive and exclusive / exhaustive unions with enum vs…
iirc most of the energy comes from memory IO not arithmetic, so it's still not great. A better direction, though.
> Whereas these days any Democrat supporting any Republican action is likely to get primaried at the next election, and vice versa. Biden passed the bipartisan infrastructure act as well as USICA subsidies. The first…
> But DOGE likely achieved hundreds of billions a year in savings. USAID alone had a $50 billion budget that was mostly eliminated, though a few billion just moved over to State. A lot to unpack here ---- If you're an…
Saying "red tribe" is a pretty dead giveaway of, say, a certain way of thinking. George Soros or Bill Gates will never be able to buy their own department for reasons that the people with the tribalist lens can't seem…