That's not really true, you can serialize as json in all of those
They fixed this in later versions with the literal: --% But you can also always use start-process like: start-process app @' your arguments and parameters go here '@
This is a really strange argument -- he's saying that PowerShell was designed so that you could more easily move from shell to script to library ... Your counter is -- you don't do that? Of course you don't, because…
Ah, that's beautiful. Using a true-Scotsman argument to claim it's not "Real" open source, while denigrating Microsoft for NIH. Classic.
ConvertTo-CSV converts each property into a single string. Rich object? Tough. You get a string. If the type does not support a nice string representation, you get type names, like…
WinRM and PowerShell Remoting do not use Kernel Mode Caching, and are therefore not vulnerable.
If Chrome uses "whatever encrypted storage the system provides" why aren't the credentials stored in the OSX keychain or the Windows Credential Manager, where the user has to re-enter their login password to see them...
Are you on XP with IE6 or something? IE uses the Windows credential store nowadays, which requires you to reenter your logon password before it will expose your password....
That's not really true, you can serialize as json in all of those
They fixed this in later versions with the literal: --% But you can also always use start-process like: start-process app @' your arguments and parameters go here '@
This is a really strange argument -- he's saying that PowerShell was designed so that you could more easily move from shell to script to library ... Your counter is -- you don't do that? Of course you don't, because…
Ah, that's beautiful. Using a true-Scotsman argument to claim it's not "Real" open source, while denigrating Microsoft for NIH. Classic.
ConvertTo-CSV converts each property into a single string. Rich object? Tough. You get a string. If the type does not support a nice string representation, you get type names, like…
WinRM and PowerShell Remoting do not use Kernel Mode Caching, and are therefore not vulnerable.
If Chrome uses "whatever encrypted storage the system provides" why aren't the credentials stored in the OSX keychain or the Windows Credential Manager, where the user has to re-enter their login password to see them...
Are you on XP with IE6 or something? IE uses the Windows credential store nowadays, which requires you to reenter your logon password before it will expose your password....