Well, it may be possible for you to simply not talk about politics, but for folks who have their rights stripped away, their water made undrinkable, their loved ones ripped from them or shunned for simply existing,…
What's funny is that none of the big tech firms would need to change their policies or behaviors, should this actually become the law of the land, as there are currently no policies that prohibit political speech from…
(One of) the largest retailers in the world also does this, I believe.
What annoys me is your continued refusal to acknowledge the unfair lack of recourse available for someone who disagrees with a decision you’ve made, and your flippant attitude around making those decisions when it comes…
Yes, because you can easily know the owners of every American corporation today.[0] This policy was updated in December of 2021. But, again, completely irrelevant to the broader topic of conversation, privacy. [0]…
> Users here are extremely quick to push back if we do something they find objectionable. This is simply not true; you act like you're the only person who's been around here for 15 years. There is simply no mechanism to…
That's your opinion, and fortunately not one that nearly anyone shares. You're doing a common Internet Thing by twisting a conversation into the topic you actually want to talk about, even though it's wholly unrelated.…
And 7 hours later, ETH is down ~10%.
Nope, not privacy related at all. I should know who I'm doing business with.
I can both believe in the concept of a warrant and wish to hide my identity from people like you.
Because we all agree that warrants do need to exist to catch bad guys... I refuse to continue a discussion with someone who doesn't believe in the concept of a warrant.
I'm glad you recognize how fundamentally different the world is today than how it was in the 1930s, because not realizing that would probably confuse the hell out of you a lot of the time.
So your most recent widespread example is 80+ years ago, and then a very tiny hypothetical set of lawsuits that have not been filed (zero prosecutions are "under way")?
You could try bringing up relevant situations where a breach of privacy was the proximate cause of a systemic negative consequence on a large scale, rather than irrelevant-but-also-terrible things that weren't directly…
I don't think folks are upset with Andrew because he disobeyed a law, they're upset with him because they believe what he did was morally repugnant.
A guy who cares about evaluating the likelihood and significance of an event taking place. I'm not value judging this, I'm just trying to determine if it's worth reacting to, and based on the number of folks effected,…
That’s a silly response, as clothes aren’t worn for “hiding”, but for the negative social consequences of the alternative. Ignoring the role social taboo plays in that interaction isn’t intellectually honest.
Eh, you may not “know” something like this, but considering it’s never happened in my country in my lifetime at any appreciable scale, it’s probably not very likely, and doesn’t realistically factor into my threat…
An irrelevant claim then, as the comment you originally replied to wasn’t about “feature branches”. You originally replied talking about how hard branches are to merge, but then revealed you also use branches to develop…
Isn’t that the problem? You see your own shallow dismissals as tediously neutral, but others as violations of the guidelines. For example, in this comment here that I’m replying to, you caveat what you say, and yet you…
Isn't describing this comment as "fulmination" snarky, which is itself a violation of the guidelines? It's at least a shallow dismissal of their opinion, for sure. How can you expect people to follow these rules when…
You're claiming what your team did wasn't "develop features in a branch", when you did precisely that.
I didn't say you could, I said your proposed "never use any branch other than main" was both factually incorrect (your team literally didn't do that) and not how the git tool was designed (merging branches into a main…
What? You want an "article" that describes how git branching works? Here.[0]. > Some people refer to Git’s branching model as its “killer feature,” and it certainly sets Git apart in the VCS community. Why is it so…
Well, it may be possible for you to simply not talk about politics, but for folks who have their rights stripped away, their water made undrinkable, their loved ones ripped from them or shunned for simply existing,…
What's funny is that none of the big tech firms would need to change their policies or behaviors, should this actually become the law of the land, as there are currently no policies that prohibit political speech from…
(One of) the largest retailers in the world also does this, I believe.
What annoys me is your continued refusal to acknowledge the unfair lack of recourse available for someone who disagrees with a decision you’ve made, and your flippant attitude around making those decisions when it comes…
Yes, because you can easily know the owners of every American corporation today.[0] This policy was updated in December of 2021. But, again, completely irrelevant to the broader topic of conversation, privacy. [0]…
> Users here are extremely quick to push back if we do something they find objectionable. This is simply not true; you act like you're the only person who's been around here for 15 years. There is simply no mechanism to…
That's your opinion, and fortunately not one that nearly anyone shares. You're doing a common Internet Thing by twisting a conversation into the topic you actually want to talk about, even though it's wholly unrelated.…
And 7 hours later, ETH is down ~10%.
Nope, not privacy related at all. I should know who I'm doing business with.
I can both believe in the concept of a warrant and wish to hide my identity from people like you.
Because we all agree that warrants do need to exist to catch bad guys... I refuse to continue a discussion with someone who doesn't believe in the concept of a warrant.
I'm glad you recognize how fundamentally different the world is today than how it was in the 1930s, because not realizing that would probably confuse the hell out of you a lot of the time.
So your most recent widespread example is 80+ years ago, and then a very tiny hypothetical set of lawsuits that have not been filed (zero prosecutions are "under way")?
You could try bringing up relevant situations where a breach of privacy was the proximate cause of a systemic negative consequence on a large scale, rather than irrelevant-but-also-terrible things that weren't directly…
I don't think folks are upset with Andrew because he disobeyed a law, they're upset with him because they believe what he did was morally repugnant.
A guy who cares about evaluating the likelihood and significance of an event taking place. I'm not value judging this, I'm just trying to determine if it's worth reacting to, and based on the number of folks effected,…
That’s a silly response, as clothes aren’t worn for “hiding”, but for the negative social consequences of the alternative. Ignoring the role social taboo plays in that interaction isn’t intellectually honest.
Eh, you may not “know” something like this, but considering it’s never happened in my country in my lifetime at any appreciable scale, it’s probably not very likely, and doesn’t realistically factor into my threat…
An irrelevant claim then, as the comment you originally replied to wasn’t about “feature branches”. You originally replied talking about how hard branches are to merge, but then revealed you also use branches to develop…
Isn’t that the problem? You see your own shallow dismissals as tediously neutral, but others as violations of the guidelines. For example, in this comment here that I’m replying to, you caveat what you say, and yet you…
Isn't describing this comment as "fulmination" snarky, which is itself a violation of the guidelines? It's at least a shallow dismissal of their opinion, for sure. How can you expect people to follow these rules when…
You're claiming what your team did wasn't "develop features in a branch", when you did precisely that.
I didn't say you could, I said your proposed "never use any branch other than main" was both factually incorrect (your team literally didn't do that) and not how the git tool was designed (merging branches into a main…
What? You want an "article" that describes how git branching works? Here.[0]. > Some people refer to Git’s branching model as its “killer feature,” and it certainly sets Git apart in the VCS community. Why is it so…