Well, it may be possible for you to simply not talk about politics, but for folks who have their rights stripped away, their water made undrinkable, their loved ones ripped from them or shunned for simply existing,…
What's funny is that none of the big tech firms would need to change their policies or behaviors, should this actually become the law of the land, as there are currently no policies that prohibit political speech from…
(One of) the largest retailers in the world also does this, I believe.
What annoys me is your continued refusal to acknowledge the unfair lack of recourse available for someone who disagrees with a decision you’ve made, and your flippant attitude around making those decisions when it comes…
Yes, because you can easily know the owners of every American corporation today.[0] This policy was updated in December of 2021. But, again, completely irrelevant to the broader topic of conversation, privacy. [0]…
> Users here are extremely quick to push back if we do something they find objectionable. This is simply not true; you act like you're the only person who's been around here for 15 years. There is simply no mechanism to…
And 7 hours later, ETH is down ~10%.
Nope, not privacy related at all. I should know who I'm doing business with.
I can both believe in the concept of a warrant and wish to hide my identity from people like you.
Because we all agree that warrants do need to exist to catch bad guys... I refuse to continue a discussion with someone who doesn't believe in the concept of a warrant.
I'm glad you recognize how fundamentally different the world is today than how it was in the 1930s, because not realizing that would probably confuse the hell out of you a lot of the time.
You could try bringing up relevant situations where a breach of privacy was the proximate cause of a systemic negative consequence on a large scale, rather than irrelevant-but-also-terrible things that weren't directly…
I don't think folks are upset with Andrew because he disobeyed a law, they're upset with him because they believe what he did was morally repugnant.
That’s a silly response, as clothes aren’t worn for “hiding”, but for the negative social consequences of the alternative. Ignoring the role social taboo plays in that interaction isn’t intellectually honest.
An irrelevant claim then, as the comment you originally replied to wasn’t about “feature branches”. You originally replied talking about how hard branches are to merge, but then revealed you also use branches to develop…
Isn't describing this comment as "fulmination" snarky, which is itself a violation of the guidelines? It's at least a shallow dismissal of their opinion, for sure. How can you expect people to follow these rules when…
You're claiming what your team did wasn't "develop features in a branch", when you did precisely that.
I didn't say you could, I said your proposed "never use any branch other than main" was both factually incorrect (your team literally didn't do that) and not how the git tool was designed (merging branches into a main…
It does make discussion easier, which is why your improper use of the term caused such confusion here, and illustrates my larger point; your team sounds like it has a fundamental lack of git knowledge which prevented it…
You're not using the correct terminology to describe what you were doing...
Your local copy is a feature branch, as you are developing features on a branch other than the branch you've designated as the "primary" branch (your "main" is a branch off of the main repo's "main"). There is nothing…
My brother in Christ what is it you think you’re doing when you clone a repo?
Learning to use the tool absolutely does help, because it alters your workflow to fix your glaring developer experience issues. Your team is suffering badly from a lack of even a baseline understanding of how to develop…
What? It’s trivial to keep these branches in sync… The more you comment, the more it’s clear you work with a bunch of coders who want to “go dark”, and there are a ton of problems with that. Don’t go dark.
Coworkers. Also you’re pushing code into this main branch from… where? Another main branch. That’s literally how git works, you’re just removing any oversight and collaboration opportunities by insisting on calling this…
Well, it may be possible for you to simply not talk about politics, but for folks who have their rights stripped away, their water made undrinkable, their loved ones ripped from them or shunned for simply existing,…
What's funny is that none of the big tech firms would need to change their policies or behaviors, should this actually become the law of the land, as there are currently no policies that prohibit political speech from…
(One of) the largest retailers in the world also does this, I believe.
What annoys me is your continued refusal to acknowledge the unfair lack of recourse available for someone who disagrees with a decision you’ve made, and your flippant attitude around making those decisions when it comes…
Yes, because you can easily know the owners of every American corporation today.[0] This policy was updated in December of 2021. But, again, completely irrelevant to the broader topic of conversation, privacy. [0]…
> Users here are extremely quick to push back if we do something they find objectionable. This is simply not true; you act like you're the only person who's been around here for 15 years. There is simply no mechanism to…
And 7 hours later, ETH is down ~10%.
Nope, not privacy related at all. I should know who I'm doing business with.
I can both believe in the concept of a warrant and wish to hide my identity from people like you.
Because we all agree that warrants do need to exist to catch bad guys... I refuse to continue a discussion with someone who doesn't believe in the concept of a warrant.
I'm glad you recognize how fundamentally different the world is today than how it was in the 1930s, because not realizing that would probably confuse the hell out of you a lot of the time.
You could try bringing up relevant situations where a breach of privacy was the proximate cause of a systemic negative consequence on a large scale, rather than irrelevant-but-also-terrible things that weren't directly…
I don't think folks are upset with Andrew because he disobeyed a law, they're upset with him because they believe what he did was morally repugnant.
That’s a silly response, as clothes aren’t worn for “hiding”, but for the negative social consequences of the alternative. Ignoring the role social taboo plays in that interaction isn’t intellectually honest.
An irrelevant claim then, as the comment you originally replied to wasn’t about “feature branches”. You originally replied talking about how hard branches are to merge, but then revealed you also use branches to develop…
Isn't describing this comment as "fulmination" snarky, which is itself a violation of the guidelines? It's at least a shallow dismissal of their opinion, for sure. How can you expect people to follow these rules when…
You're claiming what your team did wasn't "develop features in a branch", when you did precisely that.
I didn't say you could, I said your proposed "never use any branch other than main" was both factually incorrect (your team literally didn't do that) and not how the git tool was designed (merging branches into a main…
It does make discussion easier, which is why your improper use of the term caused such confusion here, and illustrates my larger point; your team sounds like it has a fundamental lack of git knowledge which prevented it…
You're not using the correct terminology to describe what you were doing...
Your local copy is a feature branch, as you are developing features on a branch other than the branch you've designated as the "primary" branch (your "main" is a branch off of the main repo's "main"). There is nothing…
My brother in Christ what is it you think you’re doing when you clone a repo?
Learning to use the tool absolutely does help, because it alters your workflow to fix your glaring developer experience issues. Your team is suffering badly from a lack of even a baseline understanding of how to develop…
What? It’s trivial to keep these branches in sync… The more you comment, the more it’s clear you work with a bunch of coders who want to “go dark”, and there are a ton of problems with that. Don’t go dark.
Coworkers. Also you’re pushing code into this main branch from… where? Another main branch. That’s literally how git works, you’re just removing any oversight and collaboration opportunities by insisting on calling this…