Dismissing the entire technology as "next token prediction" is also silly. It's implying we actually understand LLMs to a great degree when we do not. I think a little bit of humility for the capability of these…
Blaming people trying to make money is so pointless. Change the law if you don't like what is happening.
The spotify desktop app is one of the worst pieces of software by a major company I have ever used.
Can you explain how women can both be allowed to have careers if they want while also not being "forced" into the workplace? It just sounds like you want women to face extreme societal pressure to be mothers, and the…
We have very different definitions of what functional means.
>Every woman's gain is her son's loss I don't even understand this at all. If you believe gender equality is an intrinsic good then any women's gain up to gender equality would be a gain for anyone who has that…
This is literally just patriarchy talking, you think that men know what's best for women, and what's best for them is for them to stay at home cooking and cleaning. Which is awfully convenient for the men that don't…
There has always been a gender war, throughout the entirety of human existence. You just don't like that women have won a few battles recently.
If the Riemann hypothesis is solved primarily by a AI system it will not be as awe inspiring as if a human solved it. That is just how it is.
>conceded a bit reluctantly that Musescore was the better of the lot Well he said that Sibelius was the best for serious musicians, it just had a horrible UI.
Would you say the 2012 apocalypse doomsayers were correct but just "early"? After all the sun exploding in a billion years will ultimately prove them correct.
Market integration is a good thing.
Language is infinitely generative though so I don't understand how you can write down a finite list of rules in a book in the first place. The thought experiment is fundamentally nonsensical.
Searle's main argument seems to be that meat is magic and silicon is not.
What's stopping the book from containing that information? When you hear a certain set of symbols in a certain context you jump.
That is an outstandingly bad argument.
Obsidian and apple notes are basically the same thing. Obsidian just has some more features.
The search is somehow faster than twitter's own search.
Some exceptional people can close the gap, most can't.
Some people just have a several hundred year head start others.
Is the 300ms ping time why discord takes ~10-30 seconds to load?
you can generally just bypass paywalls via archive sites.
To make the claim that an object is not conscious you need to both define what consciousness even is, then you need to make a machine capable of measuring it. If you have done neither or those things then any claim you…
>The reason this is important is because powerful people are currently trying to use the dodge that LLMs are conscious to launder liability for their own policy choices, so the sloppy thinking and half-assed conjecture…
the onus is on whoever is making a positive claim. If you are stating "LLMs are not conscious" you need to provide evidence, just like how if you are stating "LLMs are conscious" you need to provide evidence.
Dismissing the entire technology as "next token prediction" is also silly. It's implying we actually understand LLMs to a great degree when we do not. I think a little bit of humility for the capability of these…
Blaming people trying to make money is so pointless. Change the law if you don't like what is happening.
The spotify desktop app is one of the worst pieces of software by a major company I have ever used.
Can you explain how women can both be allowed to have careers if they want while also not being "forced" into the workplace? It just sounds like you want women to face extreme societal pressure to be mothers, and the…
We have very different definitions of what functional means.
>Every woman's gain is her son's loss I don't even understand this at all. If you believe gender equality is an intrinsic good then any women's gain up to gender equality would be a gain for anyone who has that…
This is literally just patriarchy talking, you think that men know what's best for women, and what's best for them is for them to stay at home cooking and cleaning. Which is awfully convenient for the men that don't…
There has always been a gender war, throughout the entirety of human existence. You just don't like that women have won a few battles recently.
If the Riemann hypothesis is solved primarily by a AI system it will not be as awe inspiring as if a human solved it. That is just how it is.
>conceded a bit reluctantly that Musescore was the better of the lot Well he said that Sibelius was the best for serious musicians, it just had a horrible UI.
Would you say the 2012 apocalypse doomsayers were correct but just "early"? After all the sun exploding in a billion years will ultimately prove them correct.
Market integration is a good thing.
Language is infinitely generative though so I don't understand how you can write down a finite list of rules in a book in the first place. The thought experiment is fundamentally nonsensical.
Searle's main argument seems to be that meat is magic and silicon is not.
What's stopping the book from containing that information? When you hear a certain set of symbols in a certain context you jump.
That is an outstandingly bad argument.
Obsidian and apple notes are basically the same thing. Obsidian just has some more features.
The search is somehow faster than twitter's own search.
Some exceptional people can close the gap, most can't.
Some people just have a several hundred year head start others.
Is the 300ms ping time why discord takes ~10-30 seconds to load?
you can generally just bypass paywalls via archive sites.
To make the claim that an object is not conscious you need to both define what consciousness even is, then you need to make a machine capable of measuring it. If you have done neither or those things then any claim you…
>The reason this is important is because powerful people are currently trying to use the dodge that LLMs are conscious to launder liability for their own policy choices, so the sloppy thinking and half-assed conjecture…
the onus is on whoever is making a positive claim. If you are stating "LLMs are not conscious" you need to provide evidence, just like how if you are stating "LLMs are conscious" you need to provide evidence.