That's more of a choice, than "how things are". That is, that's a matter of rules. As in, a monopoly can exist if a society tolerates it.
Oh, so in your view, productivity improvements are not meant to benefit the workers?
And, the stability of a hardware instrument or effect is considerably higher than that of a computer with 10s of software pieces (and licensing engines) interacting. And in live music, this is rather critical; some…
Running an if/else written condition is not making a decision, it's following a rule.
Why should it be to the people to prove that their own work is not AI, and not the other way around? EDIT: I mean, the effort has not to come from people that do the work by themselves. A new technology is not…
I'm not sure how to articulate it but I think this misses the point: accountability is key here. Thinking, writing, making, has not the same merits and value, whether it is done by a human, or by a machine. You (as a…
Remember U2 Songs of Innocence album offe^forcibly downloaded on every iTunes library? This is the same kind here: there should be a simple opt-in button saying "Yes I want it / No I don't want it". Not because it's a…
That's somehow what https://sashiko.dev is.
And? Why shouldn't this (small) cost be mutualised? Why should everything be tuned and customised and priced to every single individual characteristics? There's also operational cost to handling tons of different…
> ...se that AI can easily become uncontrollable in the near future Some virus and bacteria also easily become uncontrollable under the right conditions: that's why there are P3 and P4 bio-safety labs. That's not the…
I agree also that HN shouldn't be a forum for political discussions, but I think that the political nature of technology, and the political nature of the decisions/choices made by the companies driving technology,…
Everyone can have many explanations that make sense in their perspective. That doesn't make those explanations right per se. Crediting someone's gesture of being only an inappropriate, forgivable mistake, or…
Hmmm, it's a genuine, not provocative, question: as an outsider from the US, I genuinely can't say what the USA (as a state, as a government) have done in the past few years, that is unequivocally worth of praise?
It's a promotion platform for a specific way of conducting business, and for the liberation of these businesses from democratic oversight (if not the other way around). And in that perspective, that's politics.
What if/when it mutates?
"technically".
The thing is that you are assigning intent ("realizes", "its goal", "tried to trick", etc.) where it is at most mechanical and consequential. A factory robot has no intent, it has a program and a purpose, all designed…
I am indeed (and so are you) as autonomous as long as society keeps functioning. Our chances of survival without society are... not great. And as you speak of fire: as a technology, it's been used (for good and bad…
Reading/assigning intent to agents, where it is merely mechanical (or structural) sounds a bit dismissive of the responsibility of the builders of these tools/agents.
« Raising the bar » makes literally no sense, but only if you consider a tiny segment of activities within the arts that’s about consumption, promotion and purchase.
For a very specific frame of time, and a very specific definition of "return". Looking back at history, most, if not all marvels of the world have been built without a ROI lens.
If you only see life throuh a ROI lens…
That’s not aspirational, that’s their very original purpose, which lands in their name.
> There are many implementations of sin, but no matter which one you look at… I’ve had a brief moment of hope, forgetting the point was about mathematics.
How would this make any sense or even stand in front of a judge?
That's more of a choice, than "how things are". That is, that's a matter of rules. As in, a monopoly can exist if a society tolerates it.
Oh, so in your view, productivity improvements are not meant to benefit the workers?
And, the stability of a hardware instrument or effect is considerably higher than that of a computer with 10s of software pieces (and licensing engines) interacting. And in live music, this is rather critical; some…
Running an if/else written condition is not making a decision, it's following a rule.
Why should it be to the people to prove that their own work is not AI, and not the other way around? EDIT: I mean, the effort has not to come from people that do the work by themselves. A new technology is not…
I'm not sure how to articulate it but I think this misses the point: accountability is key here. Thinking, writing, making, has not the same merits and value, whether it is done by a human, or by a machine. You (as a…
Remember U2 Songs of Innocence album offe^forcibly downloaded on every iTunes library? This is the same kind here: there should be a simple opt-in button saying "Yes I want it / No I don't want it". Not because it's a…
That's somehow what https://sashiko.dev is.
And? Why shouldn't this (small) cost be mutualised? Why should everything be tuned and customised and priced to every single individual characteristics? There's also operational cost to handling tons of different…
> ...se that AI can easily become uncontrollable in the near future Some virus and bacteria also easily become uncontrollable under the right conditions: that's why there are P3 and P4 bio-safety labs. That's not the…
I agree also that HN shouldn't be a forum for political discussions, but I think that the political nature of technology, and the political nature of the decisions/choices made by the companies driving technology,…
Everyone can have many explanations that make sense in their perspective. That doesn't make those explanations right per se. Crediting someone's gesture of being only an inappropriate, forgivable mistake, or…
Hmmm, it's a genuine, not provocative, question: as an outsider from the US, I genuinely can't say what the USA (as a state, as a government) have done in the past few years, that is unequivocally worth of praise?
It's a promotion platform for a specific way of conducting business, and for the liberation of these businesses from democratic oversight (if not the other way around). And in that perspective, that's politics.
What if/when it mutates?
"technically".
The thing is that you are assigning intent ("realizes", "its goal", "tried to trick", etc.) where it is at most mechanical and consequential. A factory robot has no intent, it has a program and a purpose, all designed…
I am indeed (and so are you) as autonomous as long as society keeps functioning. Our chances of survival without society are... not great. And as you speak of fire: as a technology, it's been used (for good and bad…
Reading/assigning intent to agents, where it is merely mechanical (or structural) sounds a bit dismissive of the responsibility of the builders of these tools/agents.
« Raising the bar » makes literally no sense, but only if you consider a tiny segment of activities within the arts that’s about consumption, promotion and purchase.
For a very specific frame of time, and a very specific definition of "return". Looking back at history, most, if not all marvels of the world have been built without a ROI lens.
If you only see life throuh a ROI lens…
That’s not aspirational, that’s their very original purpose, which lands in their name.
> There are many implementations of sin, but no matter which one you look at… I’ve had a brief moment of hope, forgetting the point was about mathematics.
How would this make any sense or even stand in front of a judge?