The truth of moral realism is a meta-ethical fact that doesn't preclude debate and experimentation regarding what the Good actually is. Just like how the existence of an objective material reality is a fact assumed by…
>There's no objective morality and no objective politics. Really? The majority of academic philosophers disagree with you, and they have very good arguments for moral realism. One thing to think about: it's not possible…
Are you really arguing that there are no objective standards by which we can judge rationality?
The truth of moral realism is a meta-ethical fact that doesn't preclude debate and experimentation regarding what the Good actually is. Just like how the existence of an objective material reality is a fact assumed by…
>There's no objective morality and no objective politics. Really? The majority of academic philosophers disagree with you, and they have very good arguments for moral realism. One thing to think about: it's not possible…
Are you really arguing that there are no objective standards by which we can judge rationality?