Does anyone know whether Debian is vulnerable? I tried the exploit on a Debian 12+Debian 13 machine but wasn't able to reproduce it myself.
I actually had/have an issue with the systemd-wrapper haproxy uses in 1.7 where systemd gets confused when doing a reload + a restart before all sessions are closed. This caused haproxy to completely stop accepting…
What made you pick Gitlab over Bitbucket? Both can be self-hosted, but I'm not sure yet which one to choose myself. We do use Jira/Confluence internally so we might want to stick within that ecosystem but I hear very…
Security advisory: https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2015-Janu...
Here's mine, with SSD upgrade: dd bs=1M count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.17496 s, 494 MB/s hdparm -tT /dev/xvda /dev/xvda: Timing…
They're working on it: http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/webmasters/puL...
Does anyone know whether Debian is vulnerable? I tried the exploit on a Debian 12+Debian 13 machine but wasn't able to reproduce it myself.
I actually had/have an issue with the systemd-wrapper haproxy uses in 1.7 where systemd gets confused when doing a reload + a restart before all sessions are closed. This caused haproxy to completely stop accepting…
What made you pick Gitlab over Bitbucket? Both can be self-hosted, but I'm not sure yet which one to choose myself. We do use Jira/Confluence internally so we might want to stick within that ecosystem but I hear very…
Security advisory: https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2015-Janu...
Here's mine, with SSD upgrade: dd bs=1M count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.17496 s, 494 MB/s hdparm -tT /dev/xvda /dev/xvda: Timing…
They're working on it: http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/webmasters/puL...