Well I guess it's time the mathematics business model is updated.
This line of thought was made popular following the Navier-stokes thing, sadly it was only confirmed after the news died down that there was 100% no way that it used the involved researchers discussions with OpenAI in…
Honestly I don't see the issue at all. So long as your infrastructure can handle it and there is no cost to you it should be fine. The only proviso is that you should not be able to block distillation on your models you…
That's included in the definition of offense. Something that upsets or hurts someone. Intentional or not intentional.
So basically all in their head. Sounds like a personal challenge one can try overcome.
It's no different really, just delayed, so slower. The same but slightly less effective.
I feel this is pedantry. It's been used in good faith as a neutral term to address all, basically no different to using words others don't like such as moist. If this level of pedantry can be considered acceptable, how…
And Ironically across the sea in UK, to a smaller extent Ireland (and I'm not sure perhaps may be elsewhere too). There's been a concerted social media push by some folks to reduce inheritance taxes and portray them as…
The models will be a commodity, the resources to run the frontier will be the luxury good. This is already the case nearly.
There are plenty of things we use and found useful before we understood them. We knew how to make it, how it works was for the most part inconsequential.
Just btw, most assume when you say Cowork you're referring to Anthropic Cowork as it's the original rather than Microsoft's white labelled Cowork. And when you say Sol or whatever model you're referring to OpenAI and…
I'm assuming you're using Microsoft Cowork or Copilot or something. I suspect it's system prompt and implementation (tooling/harness) isn't the same as that of OpenAI and Anthropic even if the underlying model is…
Then Tao for one should have no issues with this release or any other release, if it's all actually about how he got there.
I mean paying for water, do you expect this to be drinkable or is that ad fraud? (I'm referencing a supreme court judgment here).
You're asking me what the value is in knowing what the answer to the question is? I'm being serious.
I take it you don't watch content on your tv or your phone or tablet. Most things these days, good or bad, are not designed for power users. Ironically many here I'm sure are running MacOS.
You don't have to go through it. You can ignore it if you wish. There is no obligation on you to check it. I feel your concern stems from the risk that there is additional noise everyone needs to cut through. In reality…
Audio ducking is a big thing these days and becoming more and more prevalent. All phones do it.
There is truth in the statement. Hate to break it to you volumes are not uniform even for single sources.
Something interesting for folks to keep in mind. Einstein did not typically use the formal peer review system to "settle on published work." Almost all of his major papers (including his landmark 1905 Annus Mirabilis…
So it turns out there is a, perhaps informal, working system in place and we can deal with it. Peer reviewed and published insights are proven invalid all the time. This is the nature of research and how we learn.
I'm sorry this framing is just moving goal posts. If you're after new methods. Then new methods is the goal, the answer to the question is not the goal then. The animated response indicates the answer wasn't just a…
Sorry I mean in very public releases such as this trove, where many have lean certificates attached and publicly scrutiny.
You know it's valid. You're not working on incorrect assumptions. Surely there's value in that?
I don't think so, they just don't bother giving you the progress bar. Force "engagement".
Well I guess it's time the mathematics business model is updated.
This line of thought was made popular following the Navier-stokes thing, sadly it was only confirmed after the news died down that there was 100% no way that it used the involved researchers discussions with OpenAI in…
Honestly I don't see the issue at all. So long as your infrastructure can handle it and there is no cost to you it should be fine. The only proviso is that you should not be able to block distillation on your models you…
That's included in the definition of offense. Something that upsets or hurts someone. Intentional or not intentional.
So basically all in their head. Sounds like a personal challenge one can try overcome.
It's no different really, just delayed, so slower. The same but slightly less effective.
I feel this is pedantry. It's been used in good faith as a neutral term to address all, basically no different to using words others don't like such as moist. If this level of pedantry can be considered acceptable, how…
And Ironically across the sea in UK, to a smaller extent Ireland (and I'm not sure perhaps may be elsewhere too). There's been a concerted social media push by some folks to reduce inheritance taxes and portray them as…
The models will be a commodity, the resources to run the frontier will be the luxury good. This is already the case nearly.
There are plenty of things we use and found useful before we understood them. We knew how to make it, how it works was for the most part inconsequential.
Just btw, most assume when you say Cowork you're referring to Anthropic Cowork as it's the original rather than Microsoft's white labelled Cowork. And when you say Sol or whatever model you're referring to OpenAI and…
I'm assuming you're using Microsoft Cowork or Copilot or something. I suspect it's system prompt and implementation (tooling/harness) isn't the same as that of OpenAI and Anthropic even if the underlying model is…
Then Tao for one should have no issues with this release or any other release, if it's all actually about how he got there.
I mean paying for water, do you expect this to be drinkable or is that ad fraud? (I'm referencing a supreme court judgment here).
You're asking me what the value is in knowing what the answer to the question is? I'm being serious.
I take it you don't watch content on your tv or your phone or tablet. Most things these days, good or bad, are not designed for power users. Ironically many here I'm sure are running MacOS.
You don't have to go through it. You can ignore it if you wish. There is no obligation on you to check it. I feel your concern stems from the risk that there is additional noise everyone needs to cut through. In reality…
Audio ducking is a big thing these days and becoming more and more prevalent. All phones do it.
There is truth in the statement. Hate to break it to you volumes are not uniform even for single sources.
Something interesting for folks to keep in mind. Einstein did not typically use the formal peer review system to "settle on published work." Almost all of his major papers (including his landmark 1905 Annus Mirabilis…
So it turns out there is a, perhaps informal, working system in place and we can deal with it. Peer reviewed and published insights are proven invalid all the time. This is the nature of research and how we learn.
I'm sorry this framing is just moving goal posts. If you're after new methods. Then new methods is the goal, the answer to the question is not the goal then. The animated response indicates the answer wasn't just a…
Sorry I mean in very public releases such as this trove, where many have lean certificates attached and publicly scrutiny.
You know it's valid. You're not working on incorrect assumptions. Surely there's value in that?
I don't think so, they just don't bother giving you the progress bar. Force "engagement".