This tech isn't new; there was an article 10+ years ago about an inventor who had a working prototype of this, and he was pitching the idea to the military, and the article detailed how he even went around messing with…
It would be a "compelling explanation" if there was proof of their claims. If there was proof of their claims, they should take it to the courts, not Twitter or Boing Boing. It's an entrancing speculation, though.
This tech isn't new; there was an article 10+ years ago about an inventor who had a working prototype of this, and he was pitching the idea to the military, and the article detailed how he even went around messing with…
It would be a "compelling explanation" if there was proof of their claims. If there was proof of their claims, they should take it to the courts, not Twitter or Boing Boing. It's an entrancing speculation, though.