Cloud computing is really a money printer right now. Amazon makes more from AWS than from their retail business, it's nearly 2/3rds of their profit.
The only poll that matters is the one on election day.
You can just make a mockup in whatever tool you want, and pour your 'art' and 'soul' into that. Then hand it to the LLM and it'll make CSS to match.
>Many of this the AI can never imagine and won't reach by itself without human assist. Are you sure about that? It looks like artificial neural networks can, in principle, do anything biological neural networks can do.…
> I used Inception v3 pretrained on everyday photographs and then fine-tuned all layers on 68,011 dermoscopic and clinical images from the ISIC Archive on a single H100 GPU. >These 200 test lesions, and every other…
We are not close to done building things, and the existing infrastructure is not enough. We need both new infrastructure (like high-speed rail and apartment blocks) and new types of infrastructure (like datacenters).
>A datacentre is not valuable to anyone other than the owner. Ah, that is a misunderstanding of economics. It's valuable to everyone who uses AI; the owner captures only part of the value. It's just like a how a factory…
Because no one did anything illegal, or even unethical. And they're doing something valuable to society by developing undeveloped land.
Law firms are cautious about AI tools, they got burned a couple years ago by hallucinated citations. Citing made-up cases sure looks like lying to the court, which is a punishable offense. Lawyers have been sanctioned,…
I think there is a large group of commenters who actually just hate silicon valley tech companies, and they're fine with AI as long as it comes from someone else.
Yeah but then you're using Grok.
The only voice assistant that has impressed me recently is the new ChatGPT Voice Mode with background reasoning. It's miles ahead of the other assistants. The only downside is that it lacks the OS integration of Gemini…
Pets.com failed, therefore the internet is doomed. No one will ever make a successful business out of it.
I didn't say it does make it better. But it does answer the question in the title.
By reading this post you have used your brain to process information, thereby disproving his own point.
We're talking about bunker-busters - the MOAB is not a bunker buster. It's an airburst weapon designed to clear out large open spaces, and isn't effective against hardened bunkers. No reasonable amount of quadcopters…
Nope. It wasn't about metrics, it was a persuasive conversation with stakeholders.
>he's predicting it will be regulated out of existence because LE will have no means to break into systems once we fix all the bugs That's conspiracy nonsense from the usual paranoid corners of the internet.
My team at my company alone burned through $100k worth of tokens in September. When it hit $20k it triggered a talk with management, but ultimately they decided it was worth because of the value the LLM was providing.
It has immense power over federal employees and exactly zero power over anyone else.
Really? Did it? Name one university that has slashed math funding because of AI.
Plus, you know, you could use the AI to reformat it into any template you want. You could turn them all into anime music videos if you wanted. This is not a lack of capability, they didn't prompt it to use a template.
>Certainly, you are naive if you think they are doing this stuff for the benefit of humanity or a goal of advancing mathematical knowledge. Certainly you are cynical if you think it won't benefit humanity or advance…
Sounds like sore losers. They got beat at their own game by a computer, and they're mad about it. It's just sour grapes.
Don't be so sure. Robots are coming. Physical jobs will be automated too.
Cloud computing is really a money printer right now. Amazon makes more from AWS than from their retail business, it's nearly 2/3rds of their profit.
The only poll that matters is the one on election day.
You can just make a mockup in whatever tool you want, and pour your 'art' and 'soul' into that. Then hand it to the LLM and it'll make CSS to match.
>Many of this the AI can never imagine and won't reach by itself without human assist. Are you sure about that? It looks like artificial neural networks can, in principle, do anything biological neural networks can do.…
> I used Inception v3 pretrained on everyday photographs and then fine-tuned all layers on 68,011 dermoscopic and clinical images from the ISIC Archive on a single H100 GPU. >These 200 test lesions, and every other…
We are not close to done building things, and the existing infrastructure is not enough. We need both new infrastructure (like high-speed rail and apartment blocks) and new types of infrastructure (like datacenters).
>A datacentre is not valuable to anyone other than the owner. Ah, that is a misunderstanding of economics. It's valuable to everyone who uses AI; the owner captures only part of the value. It's just like a how a factory…
Because no one did anything illegal, or even unethical. And they're doing something valuable to society by developing undeveloped land.
Law firms are cautious about AI tools, they got burned a couple years ago by hallucinated citations. Citing made-up cases sure looks like lying to the court, which is a punishable offense. Lawyers have been sanctioned,…
I think there is a large group of commenters who actually just hate silicon valley tech companies, and they're fine with AI as long as it comes from someone else.
Yeah but then you're using Grok.
The only voice assistant that has impressed me recently is the new ChatGPT Voice Mode with background reasoning. It's miles ahead of the other assistants. The only downside is that it lacks the OS integration of Gemini…
Pets.com failed, therefore the internet is doomed. No one will ever make a successful business out of it.
I didn't say it does make it better. But it does answer the question in the title.
By reading this post you have used your brain to process information, thereby disproving his own point.
We're talking about bunker-busters - the MOAB is not a bunker buster. It's an airburst weapon designed to clear out large open spaces, and isn't effective against hardened bunkers. No reasonable amount of quadcopters…
Nope. It wasn't about metrics, it was a persuasive conversation with stakeholders.
>he's predicting it will be regulated out of existence because LE will have no means to break into systems once we fix all the bugs That's conspiracy nonsense from the usual paranoid corners of the internet.
My team at my company alone burned through $100k worth of tokens in September. When it hit $20k it triggered a talk with management, but ultimately they decided it was worth because of the value the LLM was providing.
It has immense power over federal employees and exactly zero power over anyone else.
Really? Did it? Name one university that has slashed math funding because of AI.
Plus, you know, you could use the AI to reformat it into any template you want. You could turn them all into anime music videos if you wanted. This is not a lack of capability, they didn't prompt it to use a template.
>Certainly, you are naive if you think they are doing this stuff for the benefit of humanity or a goal of advancing mathematical knowledge. Certainly you are cynical if you think it won't benefit humanity or advance…
Sounds like sore losers. They got beat at their own game by a computer, and they're mad about it. It's just sour grapes.
Don't be so sure. Robots are coming. Physical jobs will be automated too.