You're over-exaggerating :) From the wiki link, the very first definition works just fine. In fact, I don't see anything about unions, disjointedness in there. Certainly, no group theory. You don't need to know how to…
> more conservative and trusting of the government Don't American conservatives tend to distrust gov in general? Or is it more like nonprofessional + conservative = distrusting of gov?
I think that's partially because people generally tend to become more conservative as they age. Older generations, then, act as if sex, rebellion, and curiosity never existed.
Wikipedia has the same definitions that are in your textbook, but often provides much more readable proofs as compared to the very short and "elegant" ones or unwieldy monstrosities in your usual textbooks. At least…
> Most of the Wikipedia articles on technical subjects, and especially on mathematical topics, are terrible as introductory exposition. Yet they are trivial(and often more helpful) as compared to the arcane material in…
Are you comfortable with proving math statements? If not, How to Think About Analysis by Lara Alcock is an amazing intro to Analysis. http://www.amazon.com/Think-About-Analysis-Lara-Alcock/dp/01...
I am a cashier. Never use math. I doubt anyone outside academia and parts of industry ever uses math in its proper sense.
I am new to all this. I was thinking to get started with The Elements of Computing Systems by Nisan/Schocken. Is Project Oberon something entirely different? If not, how do they compare?
You're over-exaggerating :) From the wiki link, the very first definition works just fine. In fact, I don't see anything about unions, disjointedness in there. Certainly, no group theory. You don't need to know how to…
> more conservative and trusting of the government Don't American conservatives tend to distrust gov in general? Or is it more like nonprofessional + conservative = distrusting of gov?
I think that's partially because people generally tend to become more conservative as they age. Older generations, then, act as if sex, rebellion, and curiosity never existed.
Wikipedia has the same definitions that are in your textbook, but often provides much more readable proofs as compared to the very short and "elegant" ones or unwieldy monstrosities in your usual textbooks. At least…
> Most of the Wikipedia articles on technical subjects, and especially on mathematical topics, are terrible as introductory exposition. Yet they are trivial(and often more helpful) as compared to the arcane material in…
Are you comfortable with proving math statements? If not, How to Think About Analysis by Lara Alcock is an amazing intro to Analysis. http://www.amazon.com/Think-About-Analysis-Lara-Alcock/dp/01...
I am a cashier. Never use math. I doubt anyone outside academia and parts of industry ever uses math in its proper sense.
I am new to all this. I was thinking to get started with The Elements of Computing Systems by Nisan/Schocken. Is Project Oberon something entirely different? If not, how do they compare?