The only reason we have the GPL is because RMS didn't get arrested for downloading child porn on Usenet prior to creating it. The license shares the character of the creator.
Copyleft licenses are freedom-negative, so MIT covers it pretty well: do what you want.
Why do you think Apple should be compelled to provide software for operating systems without a sizable audience? Why do you feel entitled to support for Linux?
The only reason we have the GPL is because RMS didn't get arrested for downloading child porn on Usenet prior to creating it. The license shares the character of the creator.
Copyleft licenses are freedom-negative, so MIT covers it pretty well: do what you want.
Why do you think Apple should be compelled to provide software for operating systems without a sizable audience? Why do you feel entitled to support for Linux?