> it was the evidence from the experiment, and the way the scientific method works that did that. EVIDENCE? The parent only talk about his gut feeling, you fucking piece of shit.
> but my intuition says this is believable. We replaced that with science and fact-checking hundreds of years ago. Seriously, what a useless, stupid response.
Seriously, what a useless, stupid response. Check the place between your ears - your brain seems to have escaped. Not to mention hypocrisy: I bet you are more than willing to point out in other contexts that actually…
Do turn your adblocker on for that site. I had at some point turned it off to be nice to them - but what I got this time was too much for me. Flashing everywhere, a third of my browser window for ads, and then an ad…
If you are interested in RTOS (real-time OS) courses I recommend checking edX for the expected September 2016 arrival date of a followup to this course: edX course page:…
The actual study can be accessed for free on "The Pirate-Bay of Science publications" Sci-Hub: http://science.sciencemag.org.sci-hub.cc/content/351/6280/aa... About Sci-Hub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub
Yep. Human brains are made to see faces in clouds - and patterns everywhere. Because its the only way for that little brain to function. In reality nothing is the same unless it's identical (not a copy - but the exact…
> What I'm talking about is extremely elementary Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases, merely repeating over and over "I am right!". Maybe you should have studied some neuroscience…
At the bottom of the article: > This is an evolving publication, and I shall be extending it over the coming days and weeks to cover more topics on serverless architecture including some things commonly confused with…
Which is wrong. As is the use of "absolutely" - to show that you have the universe-opinion. What hubris. And it does not matter that some guy "himself" posted some opinion either. Right were you link to there are…
> pg wrote the site What does ownership have to do with it, you fucking moron? That does not make him more right than any other human being. Ownership means one can impose ones will, it does not mean you are omniscient.
> pg wrote the site What does ownership have to do with it? That does not make him more right than any other human being. Ownership means one can impose ones will, it does not mean you are omniscient.
But the point is that it does not do that. A neural network does not work like a computer. It does not have to predict. It is a parallel flow from input to output AT ONCE. There is no "processing" like in a CPU where it…
Terms such as "serverless" don't have a fixed sharp-edged meaning but are very fuzzy categories, except on a per-person basis, where you may (will) find people insisting on a specific meaning. When this story was…
Because the system JS uses is an ISO standard, it is a problem not just for JS, it works for the majority of use cases, and implementing a second number system (the old one will have to be kept forever) increases cost…
Depends on what you mean by "predict". Also, unfortunately I don't even remember where I saw or heard this in a lecture, but when studying neuroscience I remember to have seen exactly this question and an example…
> What blows my mind is how positive the HN crowd were about the acquisition of Tumblr at the time: Self-selection bias. Those who post in a given topic are not always the same people. What blows MY mind is how it is…
While reading that article the page changed its font-size by at least 150% five times (thus far). No I did not press any buttons. There is some detection Javascript running that gets confused. Maybe my touch screen…
Quoting from the actual Google reply: > We don't just ignore the autocomplete attribute, however. In the WHATWG standard, we defined a series of new autocomplete values that developers can use to better inform the…
Uhm.... your reply makes no sense - what he says is in support of the Chrome decision.
And even more people feel the need to let us know they are "done" with reading such articles. Each time.
> I would love to hear from anyone who read this article and it changed their life. Now apply what you wrote to your own text.
> it was the evidence from the experiment, and the way the scientific method works that did that. EVIDENCE? The parent only talk about his gut feeling, you fucking piece of shit.
> but my intuition says this is believable. We replaced that with science and fact-checking hundreds of years ago. Seriously, what a useless, stupid response.
Seriously, what a useless, stupid response. Check the place between your ears - your brain seems to have escaped. Not to mention hypocrisy: I bet you are more than willing to point out in other contexts that actually…
> but my intuition says this is believable. We replaced that with science and fact-checking hundreds of years ago. Seriously, what a useless, stupid response.
Do turn your adblocker on for that site. I had at some point turned it off to be nice to them - but what I got this time was too much for me. Flashing everywhere, a third of my browser window for ads, and then an ad…
If you are interested in RTOS (real-time OS) courses I recommend checking edX for the expected September 2016 arrival date of a followup to this course: edX course page:…
The actual study can be accessed for free on "The Pirate-Bay of Science publications" Sci-Hub: http://science.sciencemag.org.sci-hub.cc/content/351/6280/aa... About Sci-Hub: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub
Yep. Human brains are made to see faces in clouds - and patterns everywhere. Because its the only way for that little brain to function. In reality nothing is the same unless it's identical (not a copy - but the exact…
> What I'm talking about is extremely elementary Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases, merely repeating over and over "I am right!". Maybe you should have studied some neuroscience…
At the bottom of the article: > This is an evolving publication, and I shall be extending it over the coming days and weeks to cover more topics on serverless architecture including some things commonly confused with…
Which is wrong. As is the use of "absolutely" - to show that you have the universe-opinion. What hubris. And it does not matter that some guy "himself" posted some opinion either. Right were you link to there are…
> pg wrote the site What does ownership have to do with it, you fucking moron? That does not make him more right than any other human being. Ownership means one can impose ones will, it does not mean you are omniscient.
> pg wrote the site What does ownership have to do with it? That does not make him more right than any other human being. Ownership means one can impose ones will, it does not mean you are omniscient.
But the point is that it does not do that. A neural network does not work like a computer. It does not have to predict. It is a parallel flow from input to output AT ONCE. There is no "processing" like in a CPU where it…
At the bottom of the article: > This is an evolving publication, and I shall be extending it over the coming days and weeks to cover more topics on serverless architecture including some things commonly confused with…
Terms such as "serverless" don't have a fixed sharp-edged meaning but are very fuzzy categories, except on a per-person basis, where you may (will) find people insisting on a specific meaning. When this story was…
Which is wrong. As is the use of "absolutely" - to show that you have the universe-opinion. What hubris. And it does not matter that some guy "himself" posted some opinion either. Right were you link to there are…
Because the system JS uses is an ISO standard, it is a problem not just for JS, it works for the majority of use cases, and implementing a second number system (the old one will have to be kept forever) increases cost…
Depends on what you mean by "predict". Also, unfortunately I don't even remember where I saw or heard this in a lecture, but when studying neuroscience I remember to have seen exactly this question and an example…
> What blows my mind is how positive the HN crowd were about the acquisition of Tumblr at the time: Self-selection bias. Those who post in a given topic are not always the same people. What blows MY mind is how it is…
While reading that article the page changed its font-size by at least 150% five times (thus far). No I did not press any buttons. There is some detection Javascript running that gets confused. Maybe my touch screen…
Quoting from the actual Google reply: > We don't just ignore the autocomplete attribute, however. In the WHATWG standard, we defined a series of new autocomplete values that developers can use to better inform the…
Uhm.... your reply makes no sense - what he says is in support of the Chrome decision.
And even more people feel the need to let us know they are "done" with reading such articles. Each time.
> I would love to hear from anyone who read this article and it changed their life. Now apply what you wrote to your own text.