Solely because dang didn't like the title. Here are several things to consider: 1. HN's own guidelines state: "Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." 2. dang…
Which is of course their prerogative. I have notified the author of this article about dang's deliberate misrepresentation as a courtesy.
Furthermore, by completely changing the title, you're grossly violating your own guidelines: "Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."
This is called 'misrepresentation'.
Title truncated because of length restriction. Full article title: "Broadcom orders its software employees to return to work a week before Colorado will allow others"
Solely because dang didn't like the title. Here are several things to consider: 1. HN's own guidelines state: "Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." 2. dang…
Which is of course their prerogative. I have notified the author of this article about dang's deliberate misrepresentation as a courtesy.
Furthermore, by completely changing the title, you're grossly violating your own guidelines: "Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."
This is called 'misrepresentation'.
Title truncated because of length restriction. Full article title: "Broadcom orders its software employees to return to work a week before Colorado will allow others"