In this case, licensing should be more affordable than the physical sale given its ownership cannot be transferred.
Interesting, though I'll probably won't try it in bash
Yes, the Pandora's box is opened. We no longer have the moral authority to blame other countries banning US apps or companies.
"If China won't let US companies operate in China, the US shouldn't let Chinese companies operate in the US." Sounds like some middle school arguments, not some serious thoughts
Banning each other makes us as mediocre, if not low, as our competitors.
How do we define the word "diversity" for a tech conference? Shouldn't it about the diversity of idea?
This has been confusing me for a long time. As far as I know, it's clearly stated that software is not applicable to patent.
Yes, it's kind of difficult to define the 'hardest' problem. Some issue I considered 'hard' is more because of my missing relevant knowledge in this field rather than the nature of the issue. And of course, I don't want…
In this case, licensing should be more affordable than the physical sale given its ownership cannot be transferred.
Interesting, though I'll probably won't try it in bash
Yes, the Pandora's box is opened. We no longer have the moral authority to blame other countries banning US apps or companies.
"If China won't let US companies operate in China, the US shouldn't let Chinese companies operate in the US." Sounds like some middle school arguments, not some serious thoughts
Banning each other makes us as mediocre, if not low, as our competitors.
How do we define the word "diversity" for a tech conference? Shouldn't it about the diversity of idea?
This has been confusing me for a long time. As far as I know, it's clearly stated that software is not applicable to patent.
Yes, it's kind of difficult to define the 'hardest' problem. Some issue I considered 'hard' is more because of my missing relevant knowledge in this field rather than the nature of the issue. And of course, I don't want…