It is research; It doesn't need to be perfect. And the research they do is, even with this bias, ground breaking. 80% might be to get this thing running, 20% might be to finetune it for minorities. When google started…
Don't get me wrong, its not about the money itself necessarily but how you earn it. He sells himself and in my opinion he does use marketing tools and mechanisms i don't like. Nonetheless, the only reason why i care…
I read the article and i'm not following the argument delivered at all. There is no real proof to this. I'm following and reading research @ google (stuff like this https://ai.googleblog.com/ and other sources) for ages…
He is probably coning on a subtile not relevant level. I googled his SCD and yes its the same schema f with his book and everything else he does. It is not new at all. His website uses the same technics to promote 'his'…
No its not. Great that we taked about it :-)
Tim Ferris is half conartist half motivation speaker.
It is research; It doesn't need to be perfect. And the research they do is, even with this bias, ground breaking. 80% might be to get this thing running, 20% might be to finetune it for minorities. When google started…
Don't get me wrong, its not about the money itself necessarily but how you earn it. He sells himself and in my opinion he does use marketing tools and mechanisms i don't like. Nonetheless, the only reason why i care…
I read the article and i'm not following the argument delivered at all. There is no real proof to this. I'm following and reading research @ google (stuff like this https://ai.googleblog.com/ and other sources) for ages…
He is probably coning on a subtile not relevant level. I googled his SCD and yes its the same schema f with his book and everything else he does. It is not new at all. His website uses the same technics to promote 'his'…
No its not. Great that we taked about it :-)
Tim Ferris is half conartist half motivation speaker.