Mauneam
No user record in our sample, but Mauneam has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but Mauneam has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
You are that guy in early 1900s who would rather ride a horse than get in a car because cars "continued to make him uneasy."
No, it's not the "same as most other languages". C and C++ are actually the only mainstream languages that suffer from UB to this extent. The fact that, in practice, with Rust you get a crash instead of UB is 100% a…
First, he didn't call the "crash()" function, he called the "unwrap()" function. The fact that they decided to call the crash function "unwrap()" is not the OP's fault, it's the language authors' fault. Second, you…
>I don't understand? Really? You didn't understand me? That's weird, seeing as you claim to be able to understand none other than God. Contradiction >I've mentioned Aristotle and Spinoza as more clear examples of…
First you repeat the claim that fine tuning does not commit you to a religion, and then you keep appealing to religion all the way throughout. That's self-refutation at its finest. You can stop saying "any particular…
In an attempt to refute the point about the designer being beyond understanding, you appealed to religion, all the while claiming that you don't have to appeal to religion. Then you claim that one can't make a kind of…
Ahh, theologians have made various claims about the designer? The same people that claim that he showed up as a burning bush one day, and as his own son the next? Theologians have made many garbage assertions throughout…
>Where in the argument is the designer defined this way? The argument is, roughly speaking: (1) The fine-tuning of universal constants is due to either physical necessity, chance, or design. (2) It is not due to…
In your card example, the theory that posits that you picked the cards intentionally is something that can be subjected to scientific scrutiny. We are allowed to ask where you came from, what caused you to form the…
[flagged]
It does not explain why the low-probability event of these constants being what they are occurred. It does not explain anything. All it does is move the goalpost for explaining beyond unreachable and trap the…
Youdidit is an explanation, because it doesn't terminate the inquisition. You can then ask what caused you, then what caused the thing that caused you, and so on until you get to the point of saying "and that's as far…
That's quite rich, coming from somebody who took a hard line stance, used an abrupt term, put very little effort in and shut down the discussion by calling me a "troll." That said, intelligent design is shutting down…
Saying "because God did it" as an answer to any question has the same value as saying "because pixel cooked the music". If you want to consider those two groups of words "explanations" go for it. They are grammatically…
>Well, it explains why the universe is fine-tuned, if you buy the argument. No it doesn't. Goddidit is not an explanation. >Yep, just like any other answer to the question, since it's a metaphysical question rather than…