3blue1brown also has some nice visual explanations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_0yfvm0UoU
You might want to check out a very interesting non-linear spinor theory[1] which contains a chapter on dark matter and dark energy analytically explaining the formation and inner structure, as well as the ratio of dark…
Interesting assumption from skimming the pdf. Happy to hear your true thoughts once you actually read and fully understand it.
Side-Remark, page 17: http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2014-05...
Well than these are the criteria you choose not giving it a shot, fair enough.
No references. The fundamental idea is based on the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg. Anything else is new. This theory solves the problems, Heisenberg introduced with his equation by…
The downvote means: "I cannot tell whats wrong with the theory b/c I didnt even read it. I don't know what a spinor is, nor am I familiar with the concept of point splitting. I dont even understand why the coupling…
The visuals are great indeed. Same is your reading speed. Now improve your level of understanding text as well while being distracted from beautiful visuals.
Would you mind showing me the "wrong definition of a prime" in this manila envelope?
I do, we are talking about a non-linear spinor dynamic here, omitting the gamma algebra inherited by Dirac spinors. This algebra is well known and omitted as it would render the text confusing indeed as spinor products…
No, the fundamental equation 1.1 and 1.2 is structurally similar to the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg, except for two significant differences: 1) 1.1, 1.2 does not contain a dimensionful…
Read this theory, it contains everything the standard model is incapable of explaining, i.e. mass, distribution of normal matter/antimatter dark matter and dark energy after the big bang, decrease of dark matter,…
3blue1brown also has some nice visual explanations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_0yfvm0UoU
You might want to check out a very interesting non-linear spinor theory[1] which contains a chapter on dark matter and dark energy analytically explaining the formation and inner structure, as well as the ratio of dark…
Interesting assumption from skimming the pdf. Happy to hear your true thoughts once you actually read and fully understand it.
Side-Remark, page 17: http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2014-05...
Well than these are the criteria you choose not giving it a shot, fair enough.
No references. The fundamental idea is based on the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg. Anything else is new. This theory solves the problems, Heisenberg introduced with his equation by…
The downvote means: "I cannot tell whats wrong with the theory b/c I didnt even read it. I don't know what a spinor is, nor am I familiar with the concept of point splitting. I dont even understand why the coupling…
The visuals are great indeed. Same is your reading speed. Now improve your level of understanding text as well while being distracted from beautiful visuals.
Would you mind showing me the "wrong definition of a prime" in this manila envelope?
I do, we are talking about a non-linear spinor dynamic here, omitting the gamma algebra inherited by Dirac spinors. This algebra is well known and omitted as it would render the text confusing indeed as spinor products…
No, the fundamental equation 1.1 and 1.2 is structurally similar to the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg, except for two significant differences: 1) 1.1, 1.2 does not contain a dimensionful…
Read this theory, it contains everything the standard model is incapable of explaining, i.e. mass, distribution of normal matter/antimatter dark matter and dark energy after the big bang, decrease of dark matter,…
You might want to check out a very interesting non-linear spinor theory[1] which contains a chapter on dark matter and dark energy analytically explaining the formation and inner structure, as well as the ratio of dark…