Go to Google Scholar and search for "neurotoxicity of cannabis" You can find studies showing that even pure THC is neurotoxic. It depends on dosage and frequency.
Yes, price = quality because they require supercomputing resources to train. GPT-3 required hundreds of Tesla GPUs running for several weeks. That's millions of dollars just for hardware, not including power (the GPUs…
> Where is the objectivity? Objectively worse performance in life and in mentally taxing work. It really isn't that complicated. Go smoke a massive bong hit then do a calculus exam and compare your score.
> No, it isn't. It's medicine, and remarkably harmless recreation. Try reading the article before commenting.
> How do you measure neurotoxicity on yourself? If you consume it, and it subjectively and objectively harms your mental health and cognitive abilities, then basic common sense and reasoning tells you it is harmful to…
> That's not a settled debate; not remotely. In my opinion it is neurotoxic, based on studies I have seen (such as this one that we are commenting on) plus my own direct personal experience. Even without the…
> I firmly believe that psychedelics are triggers and not the cause of mental disorders If a neurotoxic drug such as cannabis causes psychosis in someone who would otherwise never have become psychotic without the drug,…
Here's a prompt: "If there is a bob outside, and a bib inside, and the bib cannot see the bob, can the bob see the bib?" Answer: "If the bib cannot see the bob due to being inside, it is likely that the bob, which is…
Here is an example of an emergent ability of ChatGPT that you can try yourself right now. Give it this prompt: "Write a short play where "Karen" (who behaves as the Karen meme) is on a romantic date with Hunter S.…
It was a straightforward response to "I simply mean his track record of predicting the future trajectory of AI is not great."
Well he bet on neural networks in the early days when it was unpopular, and that turned out to be the right trajectory. He received a Turing Award for his work that was foundational to the current state of the art.
(follow up to adjacent comment) So what I'm saying is, GPT "knows" what a cat is. It "knows" what an orange is. It has inferred these concepts from the data set. Imagine approaching someone who is tripping on LSD and…
His opinion obviously does matter because he is a founder of the field. No one believes that he is prescient. You are exaggerating and creating a strawman argument, infantilizing the readers here. We don't worship him…
Solving natural language understanding tasks requires reasoning, by definition. I think you are sticking to a narrow definition of reasoning that is not very technical. Formally there are many types of reasoning in AI.
This is going off topic, but originally I was replying to this comment: "The modern era has dramatically reduced civilian casualties compared previous generations... Precision munitions contribute heavily to this…
You are so narrowly fixated on this one specific domain which is an edge case with LLMs. ChatGPT was trained specifically to solve "natural language understanding tasks". You are missing the forest for the trees and…
> this removes any need/justification to carpet bomb anything, You totally missed the point. The mass bombing in WW2 was intentional. That was specifically the goal, to kill as many civilians as possible.
Yes shifting the goal posts and finding edge cases not well suited to LLMs, and also ignoring the chain of thought prompting. It can solve math word puzzles that are not in its training set. Yes you can find these edge…
> Give them a math problem that doesn't exist in their training set and they cannot solve it. They routinely solve math problems (and other reasoning tasks) that don't exist in their training set. Examples were in that…
You have a narrow definition of reasoning. Formally and technically it is solving a symbolic reasoning task through a sequence of steps. Yes we know it's not conscious and not human reasoning. > At no point does the LLM…
LOL. Hinton won the f**ing Turing Award for his research in deep learning / neural networks, and you're telling us his knowledge is irrelevant.
> Calculators are smarter then humans in calculating, what does he mean by that? He means AGI.
In the good old days we intentionally bombed entire cities with the goal of killing as many innocent civilians as possible. It wasn't a technological issue. The goals have changed since then.…
> When I say understanding I mean the meaning and context around it. Yes it is actually modelling the meaning and context around it. ChatGPT is a ~100 layer deep neural network that was trained specifically to solve…
"Language Models Perform Reasoning via Chain of Thought" Posted by Jason Wei and Denny Zhou, Research Scientists, Google Research, Brain team https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-re...
Go to Google Scholar and search for "neurotoxicity of cannabis" You can find studies showing that even pure THC is neurotoxic. It depends on dosage and frequency.
Yes, price = quality because they require supercomputing resources to train. GPT-3 required hundreds of Tesla GPUs running for several weeks. That's millions of dollars just for hardware, not including power (the GPUs…
> Where is the objectivity? Objectively worse performance in life and in mentally taxing work. It really isn't that complicated. Go smoke a massive bong hit then do a calculus exam and compare your score.
> No, it isn't. It's medicine, and remarkably harmless recreation. Try reading the article before commenting.
> How do you measure neurotoxicity on yourself? If you consume it, and it subjectively and objectively harms your mental health and cognitive abilities, then basic common sense and reasoning tells you it is harmful to…
> That's not a settled debate; not remotely. In my opinion it is neurotoxic, based on studies I have seen (such as this one that we are commenting on) plus my own direct personal experience. Even without the…
> I firmly believe that psychedelics are triggers and not the cause of mental disorders If a neurotoxic drug such as cannabis causes psychosis in someone who would otherwise never have become psychotic without the drug,…
Here's a prompt: "If there is a bob outside, and a bib inside, and the bib cannot see the bob, can the bob see the bib?" Answer: "If the bib cannot see the bob due to being inside, it is likely that the bob, which is…
Here is an example of an emergent ability of ChatGPT that you can try yourself right now. Give it this prompt: "Write a short play where "Karen" (who behaves as the Karen meme) is on a romantic date with Hunter S.…
It was a straightforward response to "I simply mean his track record of predicting the future trajectory of AI is not great."
Well he bet on neural networks in the early days when it was unpopular, and that turned out to be the right trajectory. He received a Turing Award for his work that was foundational to the current state of the art.
(follow up to adjacent comment) So what I'm saying is, GPT "knows" what a cat is. It "knows" what an orange is. It has inferred these concepts from the data set. Imagine approaching someone who is tripping on LSD and…
His opinion obviously does matter because he is a founder of the field. No one believes that he is prescient. You are exaggerating and creating a strawman argument, infantilizing the readers here. We don't worship him…
Solving natural language understanding tasks requires reasoning, by definition. I think you are sticking to a narrow definition of reasoning that is not very technical. Formally there are many types of reasoning in AI.
This is going off topic, but originally I was replying to this comment: "The modern era has dramatically reduced civilian casualties compared previous generations... Precision munitions contribute heavily to this…
You are so narrowly fixated on this one specific domain which is an edge case with LLMs. ChatGPT was trained specifically to solve "natural language understanding tasks". You are missing the forest for the trees and…
> this removes any need/justification to carpet bomb anything, You totally missed the point. The mass bombing in WW2 was intentional. That was specifically the goal, to kill as many civilians as possible.
Yes shifting the goal posts and finding edge cases not well suited to LLMs, and also ignoring the chain of thought prompting. It can solve math word puzzles that are not in its training set. Yes you can find these edge…
> Give them a math problem that doesn't exist in their training set and they cannot solve it. They routinely solve math problems (and other reasoning tasks) that don't exist in their training set. Examples were in that…
You have a narrow definition of reasoning. Formally and technically it is solving a symbolic reasoning task through a sequence of steps. Yes we know it's not conscious and not human reasoning. > At no point does the LLM…
LOL. Hinton won the f**ing Turing Award for his research in deep learning / neural networks, and you're telling us his knowledge is irrelevant.
> Calculators are smarter then humans in calculating, what does he mean by that? He means AGI.
In the good old days we intentionally bombed entire cities with the goal of killing as many innocent civilians as possible. It wasn't a technological issue. The goals have changed since then.…
> When I say understanding I mean the meaning and context around it. Yes it is actually modelling the meaning and context around it. ChatGPT is a ~100 layer deep neural network that was trained specifically to solve…
"Language Models Perform Reasoning via Chain of Thought" Posted by Jason Wei and Denny Zhou, Research Scientists, Google Research, Brain team https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/05/language-models-perform-re...