If someone has "elite science and engineering" ability and came from a background where they were raised by a family with a household wealth of $5, and someone has a slightly more "elite science and engineering" ability…
I thought you meant 800 across the categories.
> By the time of the ACT/SAT test it's too late to fix those things. Fix those upstream. Based on?? If someone is smart, but denied opportunity, often times this can be resolved by exposure to things - even for an 18…
> Harvard considers roughly 4 in 5 applicants to be academically capable of doing the work at Harvard I have no doubt that this is true of Harvard. I mean, after all, you can pick your own classes! That said, I think…
But shouldn't starting points be taken into consideration when you are judging someone's merit?
The SAT doesn't testing anything as high level as that.
The deficit is not printing money, because the money is borrowed.
> Any multi-family older than 15 years falls under rent control and eviction control. Considering how little housing is built in CA, that's a huge number of housing units. Nope, only if it is owned by a corporation.…
Are you still not following that this "omission" is something you've entirely made up in your own mind by selectively copying one quote from an entire article?
Doesn't matter if they have missed rent, they still need 30 days notice. These laws exist for a reason, they weren't created to address a problem that didn't exist at the time.
It only applies to homes owned by a corporation, you are incorrect that most properties are not exempt.
I didn't understand the GP to mean they were occupying the duplex. But in that context, it still violates california fair housing law.
Yes, you're correct.
> But there are areas (e.g. San Francisco) where getting a non-paying tenant out is close enough to impossible that it might as well be. You absolutely can evict people in SF, unless you are discussing the recent…
I think the large majority of units in CA are not covered by any sort of just cause eviction law. This law has several very large exemptions.
> In a tenant protection environment, landlords cannot just decline to renew leases. Unless we're talking about some rent controlled context, where in the US is this law?
Civil Rights Act of 1968, Unruh Civil Rights Act, ... there are a few other California specific legal statutes around civil rights/housing discrimination.
If you want to control who lives next to you, feel free to buy the neighboring properties.
> Why aren't landlords able to do this? Isn't it seen as immoral to steal property from an owner? Well, for one, the government should enforce contract neutrally - so if you sign a contract leasing your property, you…
> It's like no one could agree on happy medium between "landlord can eject you whenever they want for whatever reason" and "no one can make you leave, ever, for any reason". No place in the US actually has the latter…
You're not a liberal if you're casually violating fair housing law :) Everyone wants to call themselves a liberal or progressive nowadays, it's bizarre. These things are about actions, not self-assigned labels.
> Holodomor is relevant, ot orthogonal. > I meant purgers, internal thing toward Russians. Neither of those were covered on the TV. They are also from over half a century ago. > 2011 to 2015 is long time of escalations.…
It'd be more like if the US were fighting a civil war and substantial fighters on the government side were part of neo-Nazi paramilitaries that had swastikas as their flag. Oh and also if the US government started…
So many mis-statements of fact here. > They expected to win quickly and easily - and are shocked it did not happened. Very possible, but neither you nor me are in the position to know that. > Holodomor, which is still…
You can't destroy anti-aircraft guns located in civilian areas without killing civilians.
If someone has "elite science and engineering" ability and came from a background where they were raised by a family with a household wealth of $5, and someone has a slightly more "elite science and engineering" ability…
I thought you meant 800 across the categories.
> By the time of the ACT/SAT test it's too late to fix those things. Fix those upstream. Based on?? If someone is smart, but denied opportunity, often times this can be resolved by exposure to things - even for an 18…
> Harvard considers roughly 4 in 5 applicants to be academically capable of doing the work at Harvard I have no doubt that this is true of Harvard. I mean, after all, you can pick your own classes! That said, I think…
But shouldn't starting points be taken into consideration when you are judging someone's merit?
The SAT doesn't testing anything as high level as that.
The deficit is not printing money, because the money is borrowed.
> Any multi-family older than 15 years falls under rent control and eviction control. Considering how little housing is built in CA, that's a huge number of housing units. Nope, only if it is owned by a corporation.…
Are you still not following that this "omission" is something you've entirely made up in your own mind by selectively copying one quote from an entire article?
Doesn't matter if they have missed rent, they still need 30 days notice. These laws exist for a reason, they weren't created to address a problem that didn't exist at the time.
It only applies to homes owned by a corporation, you are incorrect that most properties are not exempt.
I didn't understand the GP to mean they were occupying the duplex. But in that context, it still violates california fair housing law.
Yes, you're correct.
> But there are areas (e.g. San Francisco) where getting a non-paying tenant out is close enough to impossible that it might as well be. You absolutely can evict people in SF, unless you are discussing the recent…
I think the large majority of units in CA are not covered by any sort of just cause eviction law. This law has several very large exemptions.
> In a tenant protection environment, landlords cannot just decline to renew leases. Unless we're talking about some rent controlled context, where in the US is this law?
Civil Rights Act of 1968, Unruh Civil Rights Act, ... there are a few other California specific legal statutes around civil rights/housing discrimination.
If you want to control who lives next to you, feel free to buy the neighboring properties.
> Why aren't landlords able to do this? Isn't it seen as immoral to steal property from an owner? Well, for one, the government should enforce contract neutrally - so if you sign a contract leasing your property, you…
> It's like no one could agree on happy medium between "landlord can eject you whenever they want for whatever reason" and "no one can make you leave, ever, for any reason". No place in the US actually has the latter…
You're not a liberal if you're casually violating fair housing law :) Everyone wants to call themselves a liberal or progressive nowadays, it's bizarre. These things are about actions, not self-assigned labels.
> Holodomor is relevant, ot orthogonal. > I meant purgers, internal thing toward Russians. Neither of those were covered on the TV. They are also from over half a century ago. > 2011 to 2015 is long time of escalations.…
It'd be more like if the US were fighting a civil war and substantial fighters on the government side were part of neo-Nazi paramilitaries that had swastikas as their flag. Oh and also if the US government started…
So many mis-statements of fact here. > They expected to win quickly and easily - and are shocked it did not happened. Very possible, but neither you nor me are in the position to know that. > Holodomor, which is still…
You can't destroy anti-aircraft guns located in civilian areas without killing civilians.