>and yet we can still look at it and say "yeah that was CGI". All of it?
It doesn't lack those voiced lines because of some purposeful artistic goal.
>"privately" was off which is why it says "more privately" now The actually significant change is the addition of "This won’t change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including…
"Now you can browse privately, and other people who use this device won’t see your activity. However, downloads and bookmarks will be saved." Can you tell me how the original Incognito mode disclaimer was misleading?…
I'm curious, what would you personally consider to be a step too far in the fight against CSAM?
Section breaks keep the formatting changes from affecting the previous/following content so you can place and format images as you wish.
Sure but "Also the the sora videos are proven to be modified ads" is demonstrably false, for the demos OpenAI shared and the artist made ones.
Oh, so not the actual demo videos OpenAI shared on their website and twitter.
> What is ultimately going to be undefeated is training your own model. From scratch?
Seems to be stock footage, is it surprising makeup would be involved?
It is very obvious that the amount and type of damage is not the same if you clone any random person's voice or clone a political leader's voice. It is not the same damage.
> Even if it takes a thousand tries, that means one out of thousand users would get it. If they use that particular prompt that primes the model for regurgitation. It's not one in a thousand of regular queries.
How can we disagree on facts? There are no billionaires just sitting on billions. They are in circulation.
Believe it or not billionaires are part of the public and those billions are in circulation. There are no dragons sitting on hoards of gold. More importantly: money that is not in circulation doesn't affect you or me,…
> I've yet to be confused about whether something is ai generated or real for more than several seconds. How did you rule out survivorship bias?
> but it's not a problem our economy seems equipped to solve It's not a problem at all in my opinion. > Since people like working on art projects, people will often line up to do so even when conditions and pay don't…
Is a farmer exploiting somebody's need for food?
Money isn't consumed and it only has value when used.
Neither are the things in question, the resources for movie making are not public, crew isn't public, actors aren't public. It's not a public resource in any way.
The penalty is that they lose money at the end of the day. It is not a sustainable business practice.
> wastes the time and effort of everyone involved in the production with no recourse Those people were already paid for their work.
There is nothing secret to hide, what would be the purpose of blocking it?
> it’s basically the input data compressed with highly lossy compression. Okay, extract the images from a Stable Diffusion checkpoint then. I'll wait. It's not like lossy compression CAN'T be fair use or transformative.…
Who said anything about creating a derivative? Surely you don't mean to say that any image created with a model trained on copyrighted data counts as a derivative of it. Edit: Or worse, that the model itself is…
Tell me where it says training a model is infringing on copyright.
>and yet we can still look at it and say "yeah that was CGI". All of it?
It doesn't lack those voiced lines because of some purposeful artistic goal.
>"privately" was off which is why it says "more privately" now The actually significant change is the addition of "This won’t change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including…
"Now you can browse privately, and other people who use this device won’t see your activity. However, downloads and bookmarks will be saved." Can you tell me how the original Incognito mode disclaimer was misleading?…
I'm curious, what would you personally consider to be a step too far in the fight against CSAM?
Section breaks keep the formatting changes from affecting the previous/following content so you can place and format images as you wish.
Sure but "Also the the sora videos are proven to be modified ads" is demonstrably false, for the demos OpenAI shared and the artist made ones.
Oh, so not the actual demo videos OpenAI shared on their website and twitter.
> What is ultimately going to be undefeated is training your own model. From scratch?
Seems to be stock footage, is it surprising makeup would be involved?
It is very obvious that the amount and type of damage is not the same if you clone any random person's voice or clone a political leader's voice. It is not the same damage.
> Even if it takes a thousand tries, that means one out of thousand users would get it. If they use that particular prompt that primes the model for regurgitation. It's not one in a thousand of regular queries.
How can we disagree on facts? There are no billionaires just sitting on billions. They are in circulation.
Believe it or not billionaires are part of the public and those billions are in circulation. There are no dragons sitting on hoards of gold. More importantly: money that is not in circulation doesn't affect you or me,…
> I've yet to be confused about whether something is ai generated or real for more than several seconds. How did you rule out survivorship bias?
> but it's not a problem our economy seems equipped to solve It's not a problem at all in my opinion. > Since people like working on art projects, people will often line up to do so even when conditions and pay don't…
Is a farmer exploiting somebody's need for food?
Money isn't consumed and it only has value when used.
Neither are the things in question, the resources for movie making are not public, crew isn't public, actors aren't public. It's not a public resource in any way.
The penalty is that they lose money at the end of the day. It is not a sustainable business practice.
> wastes the time and effort of everyone involved in the production with no recourse Those people were already paid for their work.
There is nothing secret to hide, what would be the purpose of blocking it?
> it’s basically the input data compressed with highly lossy compression. Okay, extract the images from a Stable Diffusion checkpoint then. I'll wait. It's not like lossy compression CAN'T be fair use or transformative.…
Who said anything about creating a derivative? Surely you don't mean to say that any image created with a model trained on copyrighted data counts as a derivative of it. Edit: Or worse, that the model itself is…
Tell me where it says training a model is infringing on copyright.