I think it is mostly for these reasons: * It's complicated so it takes a while and you need lawyers and such to make it right * Rules for training are probably hugely vague and undefined. Because you could ingest…
I think you are misunderstanding the whole topic. Obviously it's about software at scale. Picking the right solution for a problem is kind of the whole job of software development. I have gone through the migration of…
I have thought about how these tools can be useful quite a lot. I have a prompt I can feed chat gpt and it will create whole feature "skeletons" with my naming rules and architecture quirks. Taking a lot of time from…
It might be manipulated from the context. But in general I am surprised that people are now surprised when chat gpt does not make sense. The fact that it appears to make sense in most situations should be the surprising…
Super weird take. Most money is in capital. So most money needs to be spent/taxed in capital. Rich get richer and poor get poorer. That can't work. It's not sustainable. If wages would rise at the same rate as capital…
That's completely false to my understanding. It reminds me of people saying that people got all worked up about y2k and then nothing happened. Nothing happened because everyone fixed their shit. In the beginning of…
I think it is mostly for these reasons: * It's complicated so it takes a while and you need lawyers and such to make it right * Rules for training are probably hugely vague and undefined. Because you could ingest…
I think you are misunderstanding the whole topic. Obviously it's about software at scale. Picking the right solution for a problem is kind of the whole job of software development. I have gone through the migration of…
I have thought about how these tools can be useful quite a lot. I have a prompt I can feed chat gpt and it will create whole feature "skeletons" with my naming rules and architecture quirks. Taking a lot of time from…
It might be manipulated from the context. But in general I am surprised that people are now surprised when chat gpt does not make sense. The fact that it appears to make sense in most situations should be the surprising…
Super weird take. Most money is in capital. So most money needs to be spent/taxed in capital. Rich get richer and poor get poorer. That can't work. It's not sustainable. If wages would rise at the same rate as capital…
That's completely false to my understanding. It reminds me of people saying that people got all worked up about y2k and then nothing happened. Nothing happened because everyone fixed their shit. In the beginning of…