Highly recommend Michael New on Youtube for explanations of music theory basics that actually make sense without having to already know music theory. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNBiLBQrKrnvwcVRD5fS8aA
Michael New on Youtube.
Funny. The landing page told me immediately what it is. And I'm not some expert, I've only done a little bit of hobbyist JS development.
You could get to the nearest star in a few years and to the other side of the galaxy well within a human lifetime with "just" constant 1 g acceleration. Obviously this is far from easy but it doesn't seem like it is…
Unfortunately no, Everett presented the idea in 1957, Einstein died in 1955.
Rags to riches is Cinderella, which indeed is featured.
You mean overstate. For some reason, I've been noticing this mistake more and more lately.
Why do I need to do that, to combat your unsupported assertion? Why don't you show some evidence instead that faster than light entanglement has been "accepted"? The fact is, there are theories of QM that do not assume…
That's just false.
You reject my argument without being able to point to any flaw in it. Because you and a lot of other people do not accept or have not thought of it. I can't really help with that. If it's about popularity instead of…
I've never watched the show, but I have read that that is not the case; sometimes he gave the option to switch, and sometimes not. Even if that were the case, it is not stated in the problem and therefore you cannot…
I'll try one more time. Let's imagine there are two worlds, A and B. In A, Monty Hall behaves like you think: always opens a goat door, always gives the option to switch. In B, he behaves like I described: opens a goat…
Obviously the goal of the problem is to get the car. Pretending that the argument I have given is like making up something about a toy car just does not do anything. The fact is that the argument I have presented…
It does not matter if there are many rounds or one, what matters is how Monty behaves. And that is given only for the current round, and not as a general rule.
Pretty much every description of the Monty Hall problem has the same flaw, and it is here also. The problem as given does not describe the general rules by which Monty operates. It describes only a single round of…
But this is an interoperability nightmare. Number, date and boolean formats are going to be a pain in the ass to deal with.
Highly recommend Michael New on Youtube for explanations of music theory basics that actually make sense without having to already know music theory. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNBiLBQrKrnvwcVRD5fS8aA
Michael New on Youtube.
Funny. The landing page told me immediately what it is. And I'm not some expert, I've only done a little bit of hobbyist JS development.
You could get to the nearest star in a few years and to the other side of the galaxy well within a human lifetime with "just" constant 1 g acceleration. Obviously this is far from easy but it doesn't seem like it is…
Unfortunately no, Everett presented the idea in 1957, Einstein died in 1955.
Rags to riches is Cinderella, which indeed is featured.
You mean overstate. For some reason, I've been noticing this mistake more and more lately.
Why do I need to do that, to combat your unsupported assertion? Why don't you show some evidence instead that faster than light entanglement has been "accepted"? The fact is, there are theories of QM that do not assume…
That's just false.
You reject my argument without being able to point to any flaw in it. Because you and a lot of other people do not accept or have not thought of it. I can't really help with that. If it's about popularity instead of…
I've never watched the show, but I have read that that is not the case; sometimes he gave the option to switch, and sometimes not. Even if that were the case, it is not stated in the problem and therefore you cannot…
I'll try one more time. Let's imagine there are two worlds, A and B. In A, Monty Hall behaves like you think: always opens a goat door, always gives the option to switch. In B, he behaves like I described: opens a goat…
Obviously the goal of the problem is to get the car. Pretending that the argument I have given is like making up something about a toy car just does not do anything. The fact is that the argument I have presented…
It does not matter if there are many rounds or one, what matters is how Monty behaves. And that is given only for the current round, and not as a general rule.
Pretty much every description of the Monty Hall problem has the same flaw, and it is here also. The problem as given does not describe the general rules by which Monty operates. It describes only a single round of…
But this is an interoperability nightmare. Number, date and boolean formats are going to be a pain in the ass to deal with.