Yep, anyone that started investing in 2012 or later is about to learn the true meaning of "Past performance is no guarantee of future results."
At some point, I hope we can get past this argument. Learning a new language for rudimentary tasks is not particularly hard. I'm not sure why people decided that JavaScript of all things was what we had to all latch…
RIP progressive enhancement
Ok, I read 5 years ago that microservices are the future and that monoliths are dead. I'm glad we're making progress.
The article count would actually be much higher if they weren't diligent about deleting or merging articles that they don't find notable.
I'm working on migrating a 10+ year old site into a new environment right now. The technical debt is crushing.
You don't think it would be embarrassing to be standing at a whiteboard at work and be unable to spell basic words?
I feel like there's a good joke about an atheistic (and formerly Communist) country producing Bibles for a more religious country as they beat them at their own game of capitalism, but I'm too tired to fully form it at…
cool maybe I'll start answering my phone again someday
It's probably because the implementation of the algorithm is the simplest, because you don't need to modify the existing data structure. You don't need to merge or create new arrays. You just repeatedly loop and swap…
Calling it a "flaw" is probably going too far. It is a simple acknowledgement that if your physical traits or abilities diverge significantly from what is average, then your quality of life will suffer in some way.…
Things can matter to you, but they are not things that objectively matter.
god I hope this is satire I'm about 70-30 on it being satire
I dunno man. I think 7 billion people might be enough.
Sure, but venting and taking collective action in ways that will almost certainly hurt the company's bottom line are kind of different things.
It's going to be entertaining this year if nothing else.
This is why I will never call myself a software engineer, despite having a master's degree with a specialization in "software engineering." It's kind of an insult to actual engineers. Software Developer works just fine.
Probably not soon enough to be of much benefit to anyone alive today. I have no qualifications to say this, so I can only base it on the staggering lack of progress made on many other medical fronts in the last decades.
You don't need an "absurd" amount of income to be in the top 1%.
Would it really be too much of a burden for phones to just save photos at the correct orientation now? I understand the hardware limitations that were present in 2007, but surely these can't still be a factor?
Disgusting and cowardly, but if it makes a buck (or billions), am I right?
Private institutions are bound by laws that we (society) create.
It's not a punishment to not get into Harvard. Most people don't get into Harvard.
I could be wrong, but my understanding is that people were generally pretty optimistic in the early 1900s (before WW1 obviously). Everyday applications for electricity were rapidly changing daily life for people.
It's a question of scale. There aren't 7 billion beavers. If there were only 300 million humans, we wouldn't be having these issues.
Yep, anyone that started investing in 2012 or later is about to learn the true meaning of "Past performance is no guarantee of future results."
At some point, I hope we can get past this argument. Learning a new language for rudimentary tasks is not particularly hard. I'm not sure why people decided that JavaScript of all things was what we had to all latch…
RIP progressive enhancement
Ok, I read 5 years ago that microservices are the future and that monoliths are dead. I'm glad we're making progress.
The article count would actually be much higher if they weren't diligent about deleting or merging articles that they don't find notable.
I'm working on migrating a 10+ year old site into a new environment right now. The technical debt is crushing.
You don't think it would be embarrassing to be standing at a whiteboard at work and be unable to spell basic words?
I feel like there's a good joke about an atheistic (and formerly Communist) country producing Bibles for a more religious country as they beat them at their own game of capitalism, but I'm too tired to fully form it at…
cool maybe I'll start answering my phone again someday
It's probably because the implementation of the algorithm is the simplest, because you don't need to modify the existing data structure. You don't need to merge or create new arrays. You just repeatedly loop and swap…
Calling it a "flaw" is probably going too far. It is a simple acknowledgement that if your physical traits or abilities diverge significantly from what is average, then your quality of life will suffer in some way.…
Things can matter to you, but they are not things that objectively matter.
god I hope this is satire I'm about 70-30 on it being satire
I dunno man. I think 7 billion people might be enough.
Sure, but venting and taking collective action in ways that will almost certainly hurt the company's bottom line are kind of different things.
It's going to be entertaining this year if nothing else.
This is why I will never call myself a software engineer, despite having a master's degree with a specialization in "software engineering." It's kind of an insult to actual engineers. Software Developer works just fine.
Probably not soon enough to be of much benefit to anyone alive today. I have no qualifications to say this, so I can only base it on the staggering lack of progress made on many other medical fronts in the last decades.
You don't need an "absurd" amount of income to be in the top 1%.
Would it really be too much of a burden for phones to just save photos at the correct orientation now? I understand the hardware limitations that were present in 2007, but surely these can't still be a factor?
Disgusting and cowardly, but if it makes a buck (or billions), am I right?
Private institutions are bound by laws that we (society) create.
It's not a punishment to not get into Harvard. Most people don't get into Harvard.
I could be wrong, but my understanding is that people were generally pretty optimistic in the early 1900s (before WW1 obviously). Everyday applications for electricity were rapidly changing daily life for people.
It's a question of scale. There aren't 7 billion beavers. If there were only 300 million humans, we wouldn't be having these issues.