Sounds like you didn't read the parent post carefully? He wrote: > I didn't know how to write a for loop If
I'll bet a choklate bar that 100% of all developers who spent 6 year using Haskell knows what a for-loop is.
What kind of coding did you do for 6 years if after that time you couldn't identify a for-loop?
But does it really debunk that effect? The article essentially claims that the more people there are the more likely it is that _someone_ will intervene. Which isn't the same as no one feeling less inclined to help…
Sounds like you didn't read the parent post carefully? He wrote: > I didn't know how to write a for loop If
I'll bet a choklate bar that 100% of all developers who spent 6 year using Haskell knows what a for-loop is.
What kind of coding did you do for 6 years if after that time you couldn't identify a for-loop?
But does it really debunk that effect? The article essentially claims that the more people there are the more likely it is that _someone_ will intervene. Which isn't the same as no one feeling less inclined to help…