https://xkcd.com/2501/ Munroe's Law of Average Familiarity: Even when they're trying to compensate for it, experts in anything wildly overestimate the average person's familiarity with their field.
The action item isn't easy if everyone has to individually remember it going forward. An easy action item would be to add a lint rule to prevent the X function from getting checked in, even if the author never heard of…
I forsee an addition to this diagram with "the chat tab of a shared fossil repo", as one of the completely isolated bubbles to the side https://xkcd.com/1810/
I think the article handles both cases (timeouts and the first error) by cancelling the other running async operations as quickly as it can.
The allied forces did not storm Omaha beach on D-Day to openly discuss Nazism, in case you weren't aware
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marjorie-taylor-gree... Blonde, sure, but IDK if I'd call her hair straw.
> This is just a few people explaining how they de-radicalized. Now imagine the opposite How do you downplay "a few people" saying one thing, without giving even a single example of your imaginary opposite?
That's a circular argument. If journalists actually understood the distinction and explained it, more people would see the distinction after reading their articles.
> Some apps, like Facebook, allow for some data tracking to be manually disabled. But by default, it is turned on. That gives the company reams of personal data on who we are and what we are doing, which it then vacuums…
Thank you! > I'm so totally impressed at this Way New Development Paradigm. Let's call it the "Cascade of Attention-Deficit Teenagers" model, or "CADT" for short. Sounds like the content is just as mature and insightful…
If the author complains about a HN ddos, then why does everyone suggest evading his ddos protection? It seems like reuploading the content works out better for everyone. It's just plain lazy to post a raw link to that…
Please remove the link.
> "nothing more than the advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time" So for this case, since there was a definite future time, it would indeed be imminent?
I like that orthagonal suggests that they definitely intersect, but go in two different directions. Unrelated is too harsh in most of the situations you'd use orthagonal.
When the whole conversation starts by talking about environmental externalities, you don't get to hide behind totally-not-criminals who are happy to pay the cost to avoid regulations; we are all paying the costs.
You're still (intentionally?) missing the point. There is no such thing as an "accurate descriptor of political leanings". There are words useful to describe groups of people from the outside, words useful for groups of…
There isn't a single term used for a political group that you can break down into sub-components and root words to understand what it means. The best you can get will be the origins of the term, but that might no longer…
You still might need a functioning "vertical slice" of human-level AI to implement FSD, though. Leaving out irrelevant tasks doesn't make the one remaining task any easier.
http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comic/old-ways
Facebook has claimed to have proved the opposite; at least in terms of political preferences, their study said that you're exposed to people of the opposite party more often online than you are in real life. I'm also…
After only skimming and searching, it seems a bit weird to open an article on this topic with an example from tennis and _not_ reference The Inner Game of Tennis. It's a pretty good book that can be applied to lots of…
Aren't you describing Parler's failed attempt at pretending they moderate their content?
There's also an upside-down emoji smiley with its own distinct mood. Hopefully services don't start translating (: into that, they're used quite differently! https://blog.emojipedia.org/emojiology-upside-down-face/
> “Wayland sucks!” is a conspiracy theory with no basis in truth, and its supporters have spent years harassing Wayland maintainers, contributors, and users. See that "and"? Your comment here only addresses the second…
Universities still do that. It's not that bizarre of a use case
https://xkcd.com/2501/ Munroe's Law of Average Familiarity: Even when they're trying to compensate for it, experts in anything wildly overestimate the average person's familiarity with their field.
The action item isn't easy if everyone has to individually remember it going forward. An easy action item would be to add a lint rule to prevent the X function from getting checked in, even if the author never heard of…
I forsee an addition to this diagram with "the chat tab of a shared fossil repo", as one of the completely isolated bubbles to the side https://xkcd.com/1810/
I think the article handles both cases (timeouts and the first error) by cancelling the other running async operations as quickly as it can.
The allied forces did not storm Omaha beach on D-Day to openly discuss Nazism, in case you weren't aware
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marjorie-taylor-gree... Blonde, sure, but IDK if I'd call her hair straw.
> This is just a few people explaining how they de-radicalized. Now imagine the opposite How do you downplay "a few people" saying one thing, without giving even a single example of your imaginary opposite?
That's a circular argument. If journalists actually understood the distinction and explained it, more people would see the distinction after reading their articles.
> Some apps, like Facebook, allow for some data tracking to be manually disabled. But by default, it is turned on. That gives the company reams of personal data on who we are and what we are doing, which it then vacuums…
Thank you! > I'm so totally impressed at this Way New Development Paradigm. Let's call it the "Cascade of Attention-Deficit Teenagers" model, or "CADT" for short. Sounds like the content is just as mature and insightful…
If the author complains about a HN ddos, then why does everyone suggest evading his ddos protection? It seems like reuploading the content works out better for everyone. It's just plain lazy to post a raw link to that…
Please remove the link.
> "nothing more than the advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time" So for this case, since there was a definite future time, it would indeed be imminent?
I like that orthagonal suggests that they definitely intersect, but go in two different directions. Unrelated is too harsh in most of the situations you'd use orthagonal.
When the whole conversation starts by talking about environmental externalities, you don't get to hide behind totally-not-criminals who are happy to pay the cost to avoid regulations; we are all paying the costs.
You're still (intentionally?) missing the point. There is no such thing as an "accurate descriptor of political leanings". There are words useful to describe groups of people from the outside, words useful for groups of…
There isn't a single term used for a political group that you can break down into sub-components and root words to understand what it means. The best you can get will be the origins of the term, but that might no longer…
You still might need a functioning "vertical slice" of human-level AI to implement FSD, though. Leaving out irrelevant tasks doesn't make the one remaining task any easier.
http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comic/old-ways
Facebook has claimed to have proved the opposite; at least in terms of political preferences, their study said that you're exposed to people of the opposite party more often online than you are in real life. I'm also…
After only skimming and searching, it seems a bit weird to open an article on this topic with an example from tennis and _not_ reference The Inner Game of Tennis. It's a pretty good book that can be applied to lots of…
Aren't you describing Parler's failed attempt at pretending they moderate their content?
There's also an upside-down emoji smiley with its own distinct mood. Hopefully services don't start translating (: into that, they're used quite differently! https://blog.emojipedia.org/emojiology-upside-down-face/
> “Wayland sucks!” is a conspiracy theory with no basis in truth, and its supporters have spent years harassing Wayland maintainers, contributors, and users. See that "and"? Your comment here only addresses the second…
Universities still do that. It's not that bizarre of a use case