We might want to change what we call them, if we want them treated as something other than "Ivory"
Don't, you may catch something. RSI appears to be going around.
sbcl is fast, and can be really fast. Especially compared to the other cl implementations.
Commercial Lisps are better? As in faster? Do you have any supporting evidence of this? Having used Lispworks and Allegro I can't see where this is coming from.
fpm would solve their "packages are hard" problem. Additionally, when the upgrade path is "curl|bash" that is poorly thought out.If "curl|bash" installed the package repository, and then used the local package system to…
We might want to change what we call them, if we want them treated as something other than "Ivory"
Don't, you may catch something. RSI appears to be going around.
sbcl is fast, and can be really fast. Especially compared to the other cl implementations.
Commercial Lisps are better? As in faster? Do you have any supporting evidence of this? Having used Lispworks and Allegro I can't see where this is coming from.
fpm would solve their "packages are hard" problem. Additionally, when the upgrade path is "curl|bash" that is poorly thought out.If "curl|bash" installed the package repository, and then used the local package system to…