You seem to dislike FOSS *nix in general. Are they really that "obsolete" comparing to commercial UNIX and Windows?
Apple has been busy making their chips more efficient, while simultaneously putting beefier coolers & PSUs in their latest design. I believe Apple have enough leverage to raise their clock speed.
Ah. So there's no dire need for Apple to improve Mach's performance. I wonder if the computer industry in general tend to overlook at performance, that's how I feel about the hardware community, where a tiny differences…
so ELI5 here, but aren't modern computers fast enough to overcome many of its original shortcomings? I'm not a software engineer, but out of curiosity.
Seems to me that the notion suppose to be "Hybrid is basically an inferior monolithic", after all, if most functions (even without drivers) were still in the kernel, wouldn't it be just another monolithic?
You seem to dislike FOSS *nix in general. Are they really that "obsolete" comparing to commercial UNIX and Windows?
Apple has been busy making their chips more efficient, while simultaneously putting beefier coolers & PSUs in their latest design. I believe Apple have enough leverage to raise their clock speed.
Ah. So there's no dire need for Apple to improve Mach's performance. I wonder if the computer industry in general tend to overlook at performance, that's how I feel about the hardware community, where a tiny differences…
so ELI5 here, but aren't modern computers fast enough to overcome many of its original shortcomings? I'm not a software engineer, but out of curiosity.
Seems to me that the notion suppose to be "Hybrid is basically an inferior monolithic", after all, if most functions (even without drivers) were still in the kernel, wouldn't it be just another monolithic?