I'm guessing you mean hashed, or am I being pedantic? ;) Anything is better than re-use, that's not really an argument. If I recommended using "1", "2", "3" for three different sites, that's technically better than…
I'm sorry, but that's nonsense if you actually think about it. Existing passwords are broken in a matter of milliseconds, perhaps a few seconds. Do you honestly believe it's sufficient consolation to an end-user to know…
Hi evrydayhustling "If you use a randomizer, which you should" That's a big IF. People should use a password manager, or create unique random passwords for every site... but they don't. Of course, if someone other than…
I'm guessing you mean hashed, or am I being pedantic? ;) Anything is better than re-use, that's not really an argument. If I recommended using "1", "2", "3" for three different sites, that's technically better than…
I'm sorry, but that's nonsense if you actually think about it. Existing passwords are broken in a matter of milliseconds, perhaps a few seconds. Do you honestly believe it's sufficient consolation to an end-user to know…
Hi evrydayhustling "If you use a randomizer, which you should" That's a big IF. People should use a password manager, or create unique random passwords for every site... but they don't. Of course, if someone other than…