And now it is Visual Studio vs Visual Studio code vs Visual Studio for mac 3 different applications with really similar names.
Why should i take the freedom of making proprietary forks away from people? My goal with open sourcing my software are to make the (software) world just a little better, i do that by writing the best software i can and…
Or just that the "free" software people stopped attacking the open Source people all the time.
Oh like Oracle cannot make a commercial closed version of MySQL because it is under GPL[0] or QT[1] cannot have both a closed and a GPL version. There are a lot more examples of this. On the other hand look at how…
In Denmark there are two unions for IT workers: One for engineers and one for IT workers. Both of this have experience with intellectual property agreements and both gives some free help (like looking over contracts)…
And now it is Visual Studio vs Visual Studio code vs Visual Studio for mac 3 different applications with really similar names.
Why should i take the freedom of making proprietary forks away from people? My goal with open sourcing my software are to make the (software) world just a little better, i do that by writing the best software i can and…
Or just that the "free" software people stopped attacking the open Source people all the time.
Oh like Oracle cannot make a commercial closed version of MySQL because it is under GPL[0] or QT[1] cannot have both a closed and a GPL version. There are a lot more examples of this. On the other hand look at how…
In Denmark there are two unions for IT workers: One for engineers and one for IT workers. Both of this have experience with intellectual property agreements and both gives some free help (like looking over contracts)…