It's pedestrian today. It wasn't pedestrian back then. Context matters. It's like saying the GUI work of PARC is pedestrian because today everything is a GUI.
Thank you for your generic argument, but I can tell you have no idea what AOP is if you'll take that quote, which points out a very specific issue in AOP and apply it to OOP in general. Pray tell, what "complex problem"…
I guess a few people are still talking about it because it sounds significant, the name sounds as if it's competing with OOP, instead of being the gimmick that it is. We do the same thing in OOP (without the "spooky…
If there's a decrease in both protein and fibre, what is there an increase of to compensate for it? There has to be "more" of something per unit of mass.
I answered 0 gallons of milk, because I don't believe in cows. Kidding aside, I get your frustration. Trivia questions by necessity have the format of "one short question" = "one short specific answer". Real facts…
It's pedestrian today. It wasn't pedestrian back then. Context matters. It's like saying the GUI work of PARC is pedestrian because today everything is a GUI.
Thank you for your generic argument, but I can tell you have no idea what AOP is if you'll take that quote, which points out a very specific issue in AOP and apply it to OOP in general. Pray tell, what "complex problem"…
I guess a few people are still talking about it because it sounds significant, the name sounds as if it's competing with OOP, instead of being the gimmick that it is. We do the same thing in OOP (without the "spooky…
If there's a decrease in both protein and fibre, what is there an increase of to compensate for it? There has to be "more" of something per unit of mass.
I answered 0 gallons of milk, because I don't believe in cows. Kidding aside, I get your frustration. Trivia questions by necessity have the format of "one short question" = "one short specific answer". Real facts…