That is not at all what I, nor the author, is claiming, and instead of retorting with a shallow dismissal I recommend you review the HN guidelines.
Larry Sanger, who co-founded Wikipedia, provides many examples of how Wikipedia articles are heavily biased towards mainstream viewpoints. https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-... > with only…
Looks like it triggered the flamewar detector. This usually happens if a post has more comments than votes, and the post did not reach the minimum threshold (40 points).
The effect size is quite large. From the paper, The differences were substantial: in some cases, such as total brain volume, more than a standard deviation. The effect size of d = −1.41 for total brain volume (Table 1)…
I did not bring global temperatures into the discussion as I don't believe they pose as serious a threat as increased CO2 levels. Wikipedia has a nice graph showing estimated global average temperatures over time…
Which is moving the goalposts and changing the question. He's asking if a "hypothetical human time traveler" could survive hundreds of millions of years ago, and based off historical CO2 data, it could be possible.
>It's common knowledge, especially among the scientists that publish claims about rising CO2 levels, that Earth has had much higher levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the past, and that at those times, there…
>A hypothetical human time traveler, however, wouldn't survive a hypothetical time travel back to [the Cambrian explosion]. I assume you are referencing about CO2 levels. Yes, around ~500 million years ago, CO2 levels…
Fair, but that doesn't detract from the point that CO2 levels maintained 1000-2000ppm for over 100 million years. This was during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods, when life was thriving on earth. Present CO2 levels…
Coffeeshops only need to print a piece of paper and tape it to the wall. The cost of compliance is less than $0.20 I think there are better arguments for your PoV than this one.
I think the point the poster is trying to make is that if the pedestrian was looking while crossing the street, they would have ample time to react to the oncoming car. Car headlights can be seen from over 1000 feet…
>A human driver could have seen the person and/or bike from a long way off. Not true at all, the person was not standing under lit streetlights and was in the shadows. Humans have problems detecting objects in the…
I have read the lawsuit, and it accuses Facebook of making false and misleading statements in their data privacy policy. It takes issue with this section of Facebook's privacy policy: While you are allowing us to use…
What material fact did Facebook lie to their investors about?
It is. In my experience, Cogent has more peering problems than other transit providers do (e.g. L3). The submitted article is a clear example of this. I don't find these peering problems surprising, given Cogent is much…
You are playing word games with the phrase ‘considered normal’. The phrase has different meanings whether you consider it from a statistical (as the submitted scientific paper would) or colloquial (as you are)…
>but does not strongly suggest that close to normal people on average have a difference A valid point, but that does not apply to Google engineers because their hiring practices directly discriminate for ability, as…
I'm addressing this point. Earlier you stated > it seems like he hasn't touched the editorial side at all which on the surface looks true, but under the surface isn't. Bezos has been directing editorial coverage behind…
The change in coverage occurred before Trump was president, when he was still a candidate competing for the 2016 Republican nomination. This wasn't just 'a new interest in reporting on The Whitehouse'.
He has touched the editorial side. Bezos personally ordered the Washington Post to cover as many stories as possible on Trump and the Post dedicated 20 full time editors to him at his direction. I don't think Bezos has…
Using weasel words like "standard network management" doesn't imply those standards conform to net neutrality principles. It's clear that that some of those standards, such blanket blocking port 25, are a direct…
I'm aware. Either way it's still censorship.
ISPs should be dumb pipes. They should not be inspecting nor blocking packets and should transmit data regardless of its content. The alternative, that ISPs should not route unlawful traffic, would require ISPs to…
> I don't see how you can read that from the linked wikipedia page. Here's how net neutrality is defined. "Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers must treat all data on the Internet the same,…
Please direct me to a source explaining why malicious network traffic is exempt from net neutrality. Under the net neutrality definition linked above, blocking specific ports is a clear violation. Also, the port 25 ban…
That is not at all what I, nor the author, is claiming, and instead of retorting with a shallow dismissal I recommend you review the HN guidelines.
Larry Sanger, who co-founded Wikipedia, provides many examples of how Wikipedia articles are heavily biased towards mainstream viewpoints. https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-... > with only…
Looks like it triggered the flamewar detector. This usually happens if a post has more comments than votes, and the post did not reach the minimum threshold (40 points).
The effect size is quite large. From the paper, The differences were substantial: in some cases, such as total brain volume, more than a standard deviation. The effect size of d = −1.41 for total brain volume (Table 1)…
I did not bring global temperatures into the discussion as I don't believe they pose as serious a threat as increased CO2 levels. Wikipedia has a nice graph showing estimated global average temperatures over time…
Which is moving the goalposts and changing the question. He's asking if a "hypothetical human time traveler" could survive hundreds of millions of years ago, and based off historical CO2 data, it could be possible.
>It's common knowledge, especially among the scientists that publish claims about rising CO2 levels, that Earth has had much higher levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the past, and that at those times, there…
>A hypothetical human time traveler, however, wouldn't survive a hypothetical time travel back to [the Cambrian explosion]. I assume you are referencing about CO2 levels. Yes, around ~500 million years ago, CO2 levels…
Fair, but that doesn't detract from the point that CO2 levels maintained 1000-2000ppm for over 100 million years. This was during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods, when life was thriving on earth. Present CO2 levels…
Coffeeshops only need to print a piece of paper and tape it to the wall. The cost of compliance is less than $0.20 I think there are better arguments for your PoV than this one.
I think the point the poster is trying to make is that if the pedestrian was looking while crossing the street, they would have ample time to react to the oncoming car. Car headlights can be seen from over 1000 feet…
>A human driver could have seen the person and/or bike from a long way off. Not true at all, the person was not standing under lit streetlights and was in the shadows. Humans have problems detecting objects in the…
I have read the lawsuit, and it accuses Facebook of making false and misleading statements in their data privacy policy. It takes issue with this section of Facebook's privacy policy: While you are allowing us to use…
What material fact did Facebook lie to their investors about?
It is. In my experience, Cogent has more peering problems than other transit providers do (e.g. L3). The submitted article is a clear example of this. I don't find these peering problems surprising, given Cogent is much…
You are playing word games with the phrase ‘considered normal’. The phrase has different meanings whether you consider it from a statistical (as the submitted scientific paper would) or colloquial (as you are)…
>but does not strongly suggest that close to normal people on average have a difference A valid point, but that does not apply to Google engineers because their hiring practices directly discriminate for ability, as…
I'm addressing this point. Earlier you stated > it seems like he hasn't touched the editorial side at all which on the surface looks true, but under the surface isn't. Bezos has been directing editorial coverage behind…
The change in coverage occurred before Trump was president, when he was still a candidate competing for the 2016 Republican nomination. This wasn't just 'a new interest in reporting on The Whitehouse'.
He has touched the editorial side. Bezos personally ordered the Washington Post to cover as many stories as possible on Trump and the Post dedicated 20 full time editors to him at his direction. I don't think Bezos has…
Using weasel words like "standard network management" doesn't imply those standards conform to net neutrality principles. It's clear that that some of those standards, such blanket blocking port 25, are a direct…
I'm aware. Either way it's still censorship.
ISPs should be dumb pipes. They should not be inspecting nor blocking packets and should transmit data regardless of its content. The alternative, that ISPs should not route unlawful traffic, would require ISPs to…
> I don't see how you can read that from the linked wikipedia page. Here's how net neutrality is defined. "Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers must treat all data on the Internet the same,…
Please direct me to a source explaining why malicious network traffic is exempt from net neutrality. Under the net neutrality definition linked above, blocking specific ports is a clear violation. Also, the port 25 ban…