PlayingPossum
No user record in our sample, but PlayingPossum has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but PlayingPossum has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
It is still being used by a cool open-source project, Kazoo, which is essentially a multi-tenant PBX.
Exactly, and I think you'd expect the people managing those servers to be experts and do their job. That's the whole point of what I wrote.
That's the point - you don't need to know your stack. You don't need to worry if CUPS is installed, enabled, or listening on your interface. You don't need any of that, as long as you do the bare minimum and configure…
Seriously, anyone who disagrees with that ends up with even bigger problems, like getting hit by ransomware. You, not some developer or Linus Torvalds or anyone else, are responsible for your client and your data. If…
To be fair, most regular users are not impacted by this vulnerability. That is exactly what is written in the article.
I mean, if you install your server and open it to the internet without securing it with a FW, what would you expect to happen?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but to be affected, don't you need to have UDP port 631 exposed to the outside world? Apologies for being a bit blunt, but if you're exposing services like printing to the internet that…