My point was popular languages attract masses of developers and the resulting quality of code is poor on average.
Not interested since I learned that Quest uses last year's smartphone CPU. I expect something new and custom.
JavaScript is functional and oh boy!
Everyone gets this one wrong. It's static typing within objects and dynamic typing outside of objects. Sadly we don't have languages with good micro/macro split. Maybe Axum only.
My point was popular languages attract masses of developers and the resulting quality of code is poor on average.
Not interested since I learned that Quest uses last year's smartphone CPU. I expect something new and custom.
JavaScript is functional and oh boy!
Everyone gets this one wrong. It's static typing within objects and dynamic typing outside of objects. Sadly we don't have languages with good micro/macro split. Maybe Axum only.