Q-Q
No user record in our sample, but Q-Q has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but Q-Q has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
I'm surprised some people think this is a matter of checking whether formal sentences match some English sentences lol It is a matter of checking whether formal sentences match mathematical statements, which are written…
>to see why you would assume an invariant speed, the assumption isn't just pulled out of thin air at the start It's not out of thin air, it's from a very empirically successful theory: Maxwell's electrodynamics. The…
What are you guys on about >if A sees B at speed v, then B sees A at the same speed v is directly derivable from the Lorentz velocity addition formula which is the result of the usual two postulates. Why would you want…
Within historical context: This was said after Minkowski introduced the geometry for special relativity, which can be visualized on the `spacetime diagram`, now recognized as the vastly simpler and more efficient…
I find it not believable that - You derived the theory correctly (end result should match textbook result) and thought what you were doing were wrong. - No physicist you asked could explain where you were wrong - No…
Did you even read his post? what you are calling the "right" path is the "mathematician" path, assuming relativity + group structure. What he complained about, the Physics textbook approach was the path taken by…