It's: "Look! I'm busy! I'm important! I eat special food!"
The "more and smaller meals" applies only to people with diseases (diabetes, obesity, etc.). People prone to hypoglycaemia are called diabetics with insulin overdose. Moreover, soylent contains 18% of energy as added…
Yes, pointers to pointers etc. are difficult to grasp, but then again, so is passing functions as arguments. Also, information wasn't as readily available then as it is now. Anyways, to make a long story short, here's…
Probably hadn't thought of passing a subroutine address to a routine in z80 machine language he was familiar with?
Only the condition code was removed. Otherwise the parent is right and there really is an enormous amount of instructions. Fortunately less than intel, but still a lot.
All the different instructions are listed in intel's instruction reference manuals. What is not very wise about this article is that he's using AT&T syntax. It adds one pointless level between the actual assembly and…
There's also something else: Try shifting unsigned char x to right. >> 1 through 3 produce correct results, 4 changes the shift to some optimization too early, and the >> 5 the correctly optimized version. It's…
It's: "Look! I'm busy! I'm important! I eat special food!"
The "more and smaller meals" applies only to people with diseases (diabetes, obesity, etc.). People prone to hypoglycaemia are called diabetics with insulin overdose. Moreover, soylent contains 18% of energy as added…
Yes, pointers to pointers etc. are difficult to grasp, but then again, so is passing functions as arguments. Also, information wasn't as readily available then as it is now. Anyways, to make a long story short, here's…
Probably hadn't thought of passing a subroutine address to a routine in z80 machine language he was familiar with?
Only the condition code was removed. Otherwise the parent is right and there really is an enormous amount of instructions. Fortunately less than intel, but still a lot.
All the different instructions are listed in intel's instruction reference manuals. What is not very wise about this article is that he's using AT&T syntax. It adds one pointless level between the actual assembly and…
There's also something else: Try shifting unsigned char x to right. >> 1 through 3 produce correct results, 4 changes the shift to some optimization too early, and the >> 5 the correctly optimized version. It's…