Why not make education free(ish) then?
Lending is a business in itself, no?
How do you use that to predict which atom decays next?
Of course, there would be an expectation for loan repayment (most likely from employment somewhere). Is any unsecured loan indentured servitude for you then?
Not sure I understand: why would a loan be indentured servitude if it funds an education (not binding employment etc.)?
If it is quite profitable to get a certain education, why would it need the tax payer to provide the loan for it? Shouldn't that be easy to fund from the private sector?
Could also reverse it: Why should tax payers cover things that pay off anyway.
What if it takes decades or centuries to pay off for society and perhaps never for the individual (in strictly monetary terms)? How should these things be funded? Could also look the other way around: if things pay off…
How would that work as current understanding from quantum theory says we cannot predict which atom decays next? Is there a quantum algorithm that can do that?
I don't have the answers here, I a afraid, but not having at least the broader discussion might also not help (not sure what is already happening there, though).
How to build a Turing machine to tell which one of ten atoms of a radioactive element decays next?
If there is a lot of change to how the night sky looks like could perhaps be worth a discussion on if the process is still the right one (and if it is global enough).
Biological weapons? Yes, there is research on defense, but no big arsenals of weapons etc. My impression from the origin of the bioweapons convention is that collectively people decided that these things are too…
Would you say it might at least be fair to discuss how things that affect everyone are decided upon or how externalities are compensated for? Or should it be free for all?
It started in 2007. I don't see the peak oil connection there - what is it?
GFC = Great Financial Crisis. I'd look at that first rather than some peak oil for Europe's underperformance.
Isn't TRUMPF a German company?
If have a hard time linking a slowdown from 2007 on to oil instead of the GFC.
How do you get enough data? If, for example, you need a lot of people in the sample, that might not be so easy. In the abstract, should it not come done to what is the best experimental design for each case?
The laser and optics for the EUV light source are from the US?
What's an example of a report rejected because of the use of VAERS data itself?
> In directly applied math, such as engineering, it is in fact much more common to work with unproven but well tested conjectures. What specific areas were you thinking off? I don't recall, e.g., in numerics that things…
Then you have to make sure that the AIs understand the theorems (sort of build a "world" for that - otherwise how'd there be confidence in the use of said theorems? If cryptography didn't exist but the maths did, how'd…
What don't you like about current reporting such as VAERS? Where do you see the barriers there specifically? Do you have examples of doctors getting their licenses revoked for reporting something?
How would you suggest to establish causality?
Why not make education free(ish) then?
Lending is a business in itself, no?
How do you use that to predict which atom decays next?
Of course, there would be an expectation for loan repayment (most likely from employment somewhere). Is any unsecured loan indentured servitude for you then?
Not sure I understand: why would a loan be indentured servitude if it funds an education (not binding employment etc.)?
If it is quite profitable to get a certain education, why would it need the tax payer to provide the loan for it? Shouldn't that be easy to fund from the private sector?
Could also reverse it: Why should tax payers cover things that pay off anyway.
What if it takes decades or centuries to pay off for society and perhaps never for the individual (in strictly monetary terms)? How should these things be funded? Could also look the other way around: if things pay off…
How would that work as current understanding from quantum theory says we cannot predict which atom decays next? Is there a quantum algorithm that can do that?
I don't have the answers here, I a afraid, but not having at least the broader discussion might also not help (not sure what is already happening there, though).
How to build a Turing machine to tell which one of ten atoms of a radioactive element decays next?
If there is a lot of change to how the night sky looks like could perhaps be worth a discussion on if the process is still the right one (and if it is global enough).
Biological weapons? Yes, there is research on defense, but no big arsenals of weapons etc. My impression from the origin of the bioweapons convention is that collectively people decided that these things are too…
Would you say it might at least be fair to discuss how things that affect everyone are decided upon or how externalities are compensated for? Or should it be free for all?
It started in 2007. I don't see the peak oil connection there - what is it?
GFC = Great Financial Crisis. I'd look at that first rather than some peak oil for Europe's underperformance.
Isn't TRUMPF a German company?
If have a hard time linking a slowdown from 2007 on to oil instead of the GFC.
How do you get enough data? If, for example, you need a lot of people in the sample, that might not be so easy. In the abstract, should it not come done to what is the best experimental design for each case?
The laser and optics for the EUV light source are from the US?
What's an example of a report rejected because of the use of VAERS data itself?
> In directly applied math, such as engineering, it is in fact much more common to work with unproven but well tested conjectures. What specific areas were you thinking off? I don't recall, e.g., in numerics that things…
Then you have to make sure that the AIs understand the theorems (sort of build a "world" for that - otherwise how'd there be confidence in the use of said theorems? If cryptography didn't exist but the maths did, how'd…
What don't you like about current reporting such as VAERS? Where do you see the barriers there specifically? Do you have examples of doctors getting their licenses revoked for reporting something?
How would you suggest to establish causality?