You'd still need to parse the UA, which takes resources. Plus the attackers have root. What's preventing them from spoofing the UA?
Have you tried rocket.chat?
>safe In 99% of cases these devices are exploited using vulnerabilities in the software or configuration added by the vendor (such as telnet access with root:root), not bugs in Linux. >open source How exactly would a…
> Free Software version derived from a proprietary browser Chrome is based on Chromium, not the other way around. It's also pretty much Chrome with changed branding and no built-in Flash (thank god!) Thinking that…
There's literally nothing special about arch or pacman. It's just like any other package manager with newer packages.
It seems like the developer mashed the keyboard.
That would unfortunately accelerate the cancer that is carrier grade NAT.
You'd still need to parse the UA, which takes resources. Plus the attackers have root. What's preventing them from spoofing the UA?
Have you tried rocket.chat?
>safe In 99% of cases these devices are exploited using vulnerabilities in the software or configuration added by the vendor (such as telnet access with root:root), not bugs in Linux. >open source How exactly would a…
> Free Software version derived from a proprietary browser Chrome is based on Chromium, not the other way around. It's also pretty much Chrome with changed branding and no built-in Flash (thank god!) Thinking that…
There's literally nothing special about arch or pacman. It's just like any other package manager with newer packages.
It seems like the developer mashed the keyboard.
That would unfortunately accelerate the cancer that is carrier grade NAT.