The main thing I'd worry about is long-term reliability
A little e-ink status tile for temps, build status, now playing, or just a static label would be much more interesting than most decorative inserts
I wish more hardware companies treated these kinds of optional add-ons as something the community can run with instead of either productizing them badly or locking them away completely...
I'd guess texture and(or) smell might matter as much as the actual meat
Bebop: "I don't fully understand the model but I support increasing the sample size"
Yep, I have seen dogs that clearly have "a side" for certain habits, even if it is not obvious whether it is paw preference, training, comfort...
I liked that the post surfaced the bias instead of quietly ignoring it
Even in a simple setup with one dog and five treats, the measurement process can still sneak into the result
Maybe the better takeaway is not "larger cells can't work" but "larger cells need to pay for increasingly elaborate workarounds"
That framing makes the article feel even more interesting, because it's not just "cells are small because diffusion gets slow". There's also an energy budget behind it
I like explanations like this because they make biology feel much less arbitrary
I think the paralegal analogy is right, but with one important difference: a human paralegal usually knows when they are unsure, or at least can be trained to flag uncertainty
I think that's the right intuition. Legal AI feels especially dangerous because the output can look competent while hiding jurisdiction-specific footguns
This is exactly why I'd be cautious about interpreting the preference metric too strongly
Agreed. The study might show something useful, but the headline is doing a lot of work.
I'd read this less as "AI replaces law professors" and more as "AI may be a surprisingly strong first-pass tutor, especially when the student knows enough to question it"
The arcologies are such a perfect example of what these games did well
[dead]
There's something wonderful about this kind of PC game preservation
Solar Roof made sense when panels were seen as something to disguise
I think the pattern is less "Tesla can't invent anymore" and more that the company seems much worse at turning ambitious concepts into mature, supported products
And this is probably the core issue. Solar Roof was trying to be a roofing product, an energy product, and a design product all at once
Yeah, and the problem is that the premium isn't small enough to hand-wave away as aesthetics
I don't think the failure is that integrated solar tiles are impossible. It's that Tesla seemed to underestimate how much of this business is execution, service and long-term support rather than just product design
I agree phages are probably part of the answer
The main thing I'd worry about is long-term reliability
A little e-ink status tile for temps, build status, now playing, or just a static label would be much more interesting than most decorative inserts
I wish more hardware companies treated these kinds of optional add-ons as something the community can run with instead of either productizing them badly or locking them away completely...
I'd guess texture and(or) smell might matter as much as the actual meat
Bebop: "I don't fully understand the model but I support increasing the sample size"
Yep, I have seen dogs that clearly have "a side" for certain habits, even if it is not obvious whether it is paw preference, training, comfort...
I liked that the post surfaced the bias instead of quietly ignoring it
Even in a simple setup with one dog and five treats, the measurement process can still sneak into the result
Maybe the better takeaway is not "larger cells can't work" but "larger cells need to pay for increasingly elaborate workarounds"
That framing makes the article feel even more interesting, because it's not just "cells are small because diffusion gets slow". There's also an energy budget behind it
I like explanations like this because they make biology feel much less arbitrary
I think the paralegal analogy is right, but with one important difference: a human paralegal usually knows when they are unsure, or at least can be trained to flag uncertainty
I think that's the right intuition. Legal AI feels especially dangerous because the output can look competent while hiding jurisdiction-specific footguns
This is exactly why I'd be cautious about interpreting the preference metric too strongly
Agreed. The study might show something useful, but the headline is doing a lot of work.
I'd read this less as "AI replaces law professors" and more as "AI may be a surprisingly strong first-pass tutor, especially when the student knows enough to question it"
The arcologies are such a perfect example of what these games did well
[dead]
There's something wonderful about this kind of PC game preservation
Solar Roof made sense when panels were seen as something to disguise
I think the pattern is less "Tesla can't invent anymore" and more that the company seems much worse at turning ambitious concepts into mature, supported products
And this is probably the core issue. Solar Roof was trying to be a roofing product, an energy product, and a design product all at once
Yeah, and the problem is that the premium isn't small enough to hand-wave away as aesthetics
I don't think the failure is that integrated solar tiles are impossible. It's that Tesla seemed to underestimate how much of this business is execution, service and long-term support rather than just product design
I agree phages are probably part of the answer