It is not reported often by the manufacturer, but SSI and TLCI numbers can be a better metric if available. They are used by the Broadcast/Photography community to match the spectrum's similarity to Sunlight.
Can someone share how this compares to Math for Computer Science by Lehman, Leighton, and Meyer ? https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.042/spring17/mcs.pdf
Thank you for the very detailed response. I'll check the links out.
Sorry if I'm missing something important as I have experience with C++ but not rust, but is async/await the right abstraction in Rust vs. the underlying generators which I assume is lower level and closer to C++20…
Here's one with more comments than the first link in your comment : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18415708
> Most specifically, gcc and icc are much better compilers for those use cases – empirically – than is LLVM. This is interesting. Where can I read more about this ?
Why would TOTP not suffice to prevent this exploit ?
Are you sure it wasn't investment based EB-5 ?
It is not reported often by the manufacturer, but SSI and TLCI numbers can be a better metric if available. They are used by the Broadcast/Photography community to match the spectrum's similarity to Sunlight.
Can someone share how this compares to Math for Computer Science by Lehman, Leighton, and Meyer ? https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.042/spring17/mcs.pdf
Thank you for the very detailed response. I'll check the links out.
Sorry if I'm missing something important as I have experience with C++ but not rust, but is async/await the right abstraction in Rust vs. the underlying generators which I assume is lower level and closer to C++20…
Here's one with more comments than the first link in your comment : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18415708
> Most specifically, gcc and icc are much better compilers for those use cases – empirically – than is LLVM. This is interesting. Where can I read more about this ?
Why would TOTP not suffice to prevent this exploit ?
Are you sure it wasn't investment based EB-5 ?