I really doubt it's like a "solid junior developer". If it could do the work of a solid junior developer it would be making programming projects 10-100x faster because it can do things several times faster than a person…
I think it was deliberate but just as a joke.
This doesn't seem very helpful at all. First it seems impossibly difficult to execute and probably won't benefit the artists much.
>Not, if the worker is an engineer or similar. Some engineers built tools that improved building tools Those engineers consented to creating the new tools so that's different
How is it "technically correct"? It's just plain wrong.
> You only see top programmers who started as kids and probably won some Olympiads and programming competitions, and this continued in their 20s and maybe kept their skill up till 30s but that's about it. What do they…
> As any generalization this one too is, of course, incorrect. His statement wasn't a generalization to repeating this back does not make sense.
I mean that's where the term came from, after all.
I think the description in the article was actually good. In particular, the part where they say: > This is the metaphor used to describe the unpredictability of chaotic systems:tiny uncertainties in the initial…
Doesn't change the fact that it's a bad experiment. Anyone familiar with DALL-E would predict this result. He should have taken some time to understand what DALL-E can do and proposed an actually interesting experiment.
I think it's just a bad experiment. The author must have been truly ignorant about the capabilities and utilities of DALL-E if he thought this experiment would yield interesting results.
If he didn't deliberately to make DALL-E look bad than he did it out of ignorance of what DALL-E's strengths and weaknesses are. Your evaluation of what is "simple" and what is "more complex" aren't in line with what…
Well that's what mathematicians like to do.
My understanding of this situation is that they found a way to multiply 4x4 matrices that requires fewer multiplications than Strassen's . This implies that that can generalize to a way to multiply n x n matrices with a…
You don't know that.
This guy was born to be a Nintendo hacker.
I don't see anything wrong with this situation. People who exhibit profit-seeking behavior (entrepreneurs) can make much more money than people don't exhibit profit-seeking behavior (PhD students). That sounds like a…
> goal post moving You're being silly. The guy is explaining his perspective. He's explaining what he believes and why he believes it. He's not writing a thesis or constructing some logical argument. This isn't a…
Even the smartest people can be wrong and it can take an outside perspective for them to realize this. This isn't an example of someone "fileting" another's argument. It's an example of two professionals have a…
> His official IQ of 230 remains the highest officially measured IQ in the world. Terrence Tao doesn't have an official IQ. People like to make up numbers for smart people's IQs.
That's a pretty bold model for human cognition. It's not something you can just assume.
This article is missing so much. He keeps saying F# is the best but doesn't describe anything about the language. He discussed the criteria he was using but didn't say anything about how F# excels in these criteria. It…
I guess you're right. But I was trying to defend Valmar's statement which I still think is basically right in this context. Computers can't really implement non-deterministic algorithms.
Yeah the issue seems to be the concept of a "word" not being precisely defined. But I don't think that's a problem. I'd be concerned if the numbers were dramatically different but they're pretty close so there isn't an…
>> To give an example, what if the algorithm is to generate the correct algorithm? That's not a description of an algorithm. You've stated a "problem". An algorithm, by definition, is an actual deterministic procedure.
I really doubt it's like a "solid junior developer". If it could do the work of a solid junior developer it would be making programming projects 10-100x faster because it can do things several times faster than a person…
I think it was deliberate but just as a joke.
This doesn't seem very helpful at all. First it seems impossibly difficult to execute and probably won't benefit the artists much.
>Not, if the worker is an engineer or similar. Some engineers built tools that improved building tools Those engineers consented to creating the new tools so that's different
How is it "technically correct"? It's just plain wrong.
> You only see top programmers who started as kids and probably won some Olympiads and programming competitions, and this continued in their 20s and maybe kept their skill up till 30s but that's about it. What do they…
> As any generalization this one too is, of course, incorrect. His statement wasn't a generalization to repeating this back does not make sense.
I mean that's where the term came from, after all.
I think the description in the article was actually good. In particular, the part where they say: > This is the metaphor used to describe the unpredictability of chaotic systems:tiny uncertainties in the initial…
Doesn't change the fact that it's a bad experiment. Anyone familiar with DALL-E would predict this result. He should have taken some time to understand what DALL-E can do and proposed an actually interesting experiment.
I think it's just a bad experiment. The author must have been truly ignorant about the capabilities and utilities of DALL-E if he thought this experiment would yield interesting results.
If he didn't deliberately to make DALL-E look bad than he did it out of ignorance of what DALL-E's strengths and weaknesses are. Your evaluation of what is "simple" and what is "more complex" aren't in line with what…
Well that's what mathematicians like to do.
My understanding of this situation is that they found a way to multiply 4x4 matrices that requires fewer multiplications than Strassen's . This implies that that can generalize to a way to multiply n x n matrices with a…
You don't know that.
This guy was born to be a Nintendo hacker.
I don't see anything wrong with this situation. People who exhibit profit-seeking behavior (entrepreneurs) can make much more money than people don't exhibit profit-seeking behavior (PhD students). That sounds like a…
> goal post moving You're being silly. The guy is explaining his perspective. He's explaining what he believes and why he believes it. He's not writing a thesis or constructing some logical argument. This isn't a…
Even the smartest people can be wrong and it can take an outside perspective for them to realize this. This isn't an example of someone "fileting" another's argument. It's an example of two professionals have a…
> His official IQ of 230 remains the highest officially measured IQ in the world. Terrence Tao doesn't have an official IQ. People like to make up numbers for smart people's IQs.
That's a pretty bold model for human cognition. It's not something you can just assume.
This article is missing so much. He keeps saying F# is the best but doesn't describe anything about the language. He discussed the criteria he was using but didn't say anything about how F# excels in these criteria. It…
I guess you're right. But I was trying to defend Valmar's statement which I still think is basically right in this context. Computers can't really implement non-deterministic algorithms.
Yeah the issue seems to be the concept of a "word" not being precisely defined. But I don't think that's a problem. I'd be concerned if the numbers were dramatically different but they're pretty close so there isn't an…
>> To give an example, what if the algorithm is to generate the correct algorithm? That's not a description of an algorithm. You've stated a "problem". An algorithm, by definition, is an actual deterministic procedure.