That i get heavy downvoted here just proof that i hit a nerve. Job done. I'm happy with that. People seem to just see the FUD Articles and think right away "Oh yea, MIT, must be true", without even thinking about…
How does the fact that he is not invested give him the right to spread false informations and throw dirt? When i see bullshit, i call it out. simple as that. My opinion is as good as his. But my sources are much better…
Wonder why you only post the old negative articles. There are maybe 5 articles that claim they found something negative, but 20 that are positive or directly debunking the negative articles using credible professional…
That i get heavy downvoted here just proof that i hit a nerve. Job done. I'm happy with that. People seem to just see the FUD Articles and think right away "Oh yea, MIT, must be true", without even thinking about…
How does the fact that he is not invested give him the right to spread false informations and throw dirt? When i see bullshit, i call it out. simple as that. My opinion is as good as his. But my sources are much better…
Wonder why you only post the old negative articles. There are maybe 5 articles that claim they found something negative, but 20 that are positive or directly debunking the negative articles using credible professional…